Water-logged finds generally consist of loose components since the
threads used to
sew the objects together does not survive humid
burial. A tracking system should be used for keeping the loose components in order throughout the
analysis and
conservation processes. For wet archaeological leather, the first step is cleaning gently in water with a small soft
brush. Conservation is preferably performed after the
documentation phase. Documentation consists of
drawings and written notes,
photographic records are less useful since blackish leather does not show fine detail well. The first step for the Goubitz notation registration is an exact tracing of the fragment’s outline, usually positioned grain side down, flesh side up. Then
symbols that indicate the type of
stitches and seams are drawn in their appropriate place inside the outline.
Sole constructions (the way in which the upper parts of the shoe is fixed to the sole),
fastening method and ensembles of components from the same shoe as well as
animal type, leather thickness, folds and creases are usually checked. If present, decoration type and technique used are also recorded. Most archaeological recovered leather artifacts are parts of footwear and may be combined with
wood,
fibre or
metal parts. The technical details such as shoe construction technique, fastening method and fashion elements are used to establish a
typology for a specific find group. Shoe type indicates the kinds of footwear such as
boots, shoes, pattens, overshoes, etcetera. Shoe style is the consistent combination of a fastening method, height, fashion and decoration elements on a significant quantity of recovered shoes. Style nomenclature based on find place's name has been partly established for Roman period finds. Due to changes in fashion and the fact that shoes have a limited
life span due to use, footwear is a chronologically sensitive material excavation and represents a closely dated chronological source for archeology. The find context, stratigraphic placement and other
dating methods contribute to establishing a specific chronology. Further research for comparative parallel examples among the existing archaeological archives (collections, publications, reports) helps to define a relative chronology for the shoe types and styles. ==See also==