Media and public reactions Following Fay's sentence, the case received coverage by the American, Singaporean and international media. Some US news outlets launched scathing attacks on Singapore's judicial system for what they considered an "archaic punishment", while others turned the issue into one of Singapore asserting "
Asian values" towards "
western decadence".
The New York Times,
The Washington Post and the
Los Angeles Times ran editorials and op-eds condemning the punishment.
USA Today reported that the caning involved "bits of flesh flying with each stroke." However, Singapore also found supporters among the foreign media and the US public. For example,
Chicago Tribune columnist Mike Royko reported that he had been sent a large number of letters, nearly all of which supported the punishment. A
Los Angeles Times poll found that Americans were evenly divided (49% approved, 48% disapproved) as to the appropriateness of the punishment, but would have only been 36% in favor had the sentence been handed down inside the US.
From the United States government The official position of the
Clinton administration was that although it recognized Singapore's right to punish Fay within the
due process of law, the punishment of caning was "excessive" for a teenager who committed a non-violent crime. The
United States Embassy in Singapore claimed that, while the graffiti and physical damage to the cars was not permanent, caning could leave Fay with permanent physical scars.
Bill Clinton, the then-
President of the United States, also called Fay's punishment "extreme" and "mistaken", and pressured the Singapore government to grant Fay clemency from caning. Two dozen United States senators signed a letter to the Singapore government also appealing for clemency.
From the Singapore government The
Singapore government stood its ground and did not grant clemency to Fay. Fay was caned on May 5, 1994, at the
Queenstown Remand Centre. == Aftermath ==