In analogy with the interpretation of the
cup product in terms of the
Künneth formula, we can explain the existence of the cap product in the following way. Using
CW approximation we may assume that X is a
CW-complex and C_\bullet(X) (and C^\bullet(X)) is the complex of its cellular chains (or cochains, respectively). Consider then the composition C_\bullet(X) \otimes C^\bullet(X) \overset{\Delta_* \otimes \mathrm{Id}}{\longrightarrow} C_\bullet(X) \otimes C_\bullet(X) \otimes C^\bullet(X) \overset{\mathrm{Id} \otimes \varepsilon}{\longrightarrow} C_\bullet(X) where we are taking
tensor products of chain complexes, \Delta \colon X \to X \times X is the
diagonal map which induces the map \Delta_* \colon C_\bullet(X)\to C_\bullet(X \times X)\cong C_\bullet(X)\otimes C_\bullet(X) on the chain complex, and \varepsilon \colon C_p(X) \otimes C^q(X) \to \mathbb{Z} is the
evaluation map (always 0 except for p=q). This composition then passes to the quotient to define the cap product \frown \colon H_\bullet(X) \times H^\bullet(X) \to H_\bullet(X), and looking carefully at the above composition shows that it indeed takes the form of maps \frown \colon H_p(X) \times H^q(X) \to H_{p-q}(X), which is always zero for p . ==Fundamental class==