Between 1945 and 1947, three special laws were enacted to bring capital punishment back into the penal code, to address crimes committed during the
occupation of Denmark. These were
ex post facto laws and were part of the purges (Danish:
Retsopgøret) attempting to meet public opinion demanding severe punishment for wartime offenders, in particular certain
informants and those
HIPO and
Gestapo officers responsible for brutal murders or torture. About 13,500 people were sentenced as collaborators, denouncers or traitors under these laws. About 400 were killed, mostly in extralegal reprisals, (
See: Freetown Christiania#Barracks and ramparts) The last person to be executed in Denmark was
Ib Birkedal Hansen, shot by firing squad on 20 July 1950.
Political background to the post-World War II purges In 1943, the clandestine
Danish Freedom Council first issued their thoughts about Denmark's return to democracy after the war. Among their demands was prosecution of war criminals and of those responsible for the violation of Denmark's legal system and independence. They endorsed retroactive legislation but were then opposed to the death penalty. Shortly before the German surrender, however, the Freedom Council worked with a clandestine committee of lawyers to elaborate a proposal for a war crimes Act that included the death penalty. The Prime Minister appointed another committee, consisting of civil servants and judges. These two proposals were merged in a subsequent bill. A major point of difference was whether the law would be retroactive to only 29 August 1943, when the Danish government resigned, or all the way back to 9 April 1940 when the occupation had begun. The resistance movement got its way and the latter was decided. The first penal code appendix bill came before Parliament from 26 to 30 May 1945, just three weeks after the liberation on 5 May. 127 members of the
Folketing voted for the law, 5 members of the
Justice Party abstained because of opposition to the death penalty, and 19 were absent. On 31 May it was confirmed by the
Landsting by 67 votes for, 1 against and 8 were absent. Among the opponents were J.K. Jensen of the
Radical Liberal Party and
Oluf Pedersen of the Justice Party. Pedersen proposed an amendment which would postpone any executions until a referendum had confirmed the new law. Subsequently, he received threats from former resistance fighters. The only politician who actually ventured to cast a 'no' vote was
Ingeborg Hansen, speaker of the
Landsting.
K.K. Steincke of the
Social Democrats, himself a lawyer, expressed the general viewpoint in this way:
If anyone in 1939 had claimed that in six years from then I would be endorsing a bill about the death penalty, with retroactive force no less, I would not have regarded him as sane. But since then, barbary and lawlessness have occurred, the normal state of law has been violated deeply, and I feel then more tied to a deeply violated public conscience than to normal conditions. We must deal with these criminals, not of a lust for revenge, but so that we soon may return to normal conditions. The purge after World War II has been widely debated, partially because small offences were sentenced quicker and generally more severely than trials for greater offences which lasted longer, while moods were cooling down after the end of the war. Another point of critique was the
retroactivity of the law. Contrarily, proponents in the 1945 debate argued that if the death penalty was not re-applied, war criminals would be subject to
mob justice or
lynchings. According to a 1945 opinion poll, about 90 percent of the population were in favour of a death penalty for certain war criminals. The background been documented in depth by historian Ditlev Tamm. ==After 1950==