First condition The first condition may be relaxed: it is enough to assume that is analytic in ,
continuous in , and satisfies|f(z)| \leq C e^{\tau|z|}, \quad \operatorname{Re} z > 0for some real values , .
Second condition To see that the second condition is sharp, consider the function . It vanishes on the integers; however, it grows exponentially on the
imaginary axis with a growth rate of , and indeed it is not identically zero.
Third condition A result due to relaxes the condition that vanish on the integers. Namely, Rubel showed that the conclusion of the theorem remains valid if vanishes on a subset of
upper density 1, meaning that :
\limsup_{n \to \infty} \frac{\left| A \cap \{0,1,\ldots,n-1\} \right|}{n} = 1. This condition is sharp, meaning that the theorem fails for sets of upper density smaller than 1. ==Applications==