Function of the horns Carnotaurus is the only known carnivorous bipedal animal with a pair of horns on the frontal bone. Gerardo Mazzetta and colleagues (1998) propose that the horns might also have been used to injure or kill small prey. Though horn cores are blunt, they may have had a similar form to modern
bovid horns if there was a
keratinous covering. However, this would be the only reported example of horns being used as hunting weapons in animals. This interpretation was questioned by François Therrien and colleagues (2005), who found that the biting force of
Carnotaurus was twice that of the
American alligator, which may have the strongest bite of any living
tetrapod. These researchers also noted analogies with modern
Komodo dragons: the
flexural strength of the lower jaw decreases towards the tip linearly, indicating that the jaws were not suited for high precision catching of small prey but for delivering slashing wounds to weaken big prey. As a consequence, according to this study,
Carnotaurus must have mainly preyed upon large animals, possibly by ambush. In dinosaurs, the most important locomotor muscle was located in the tail. This muscle, called the
caudofemoralis, attaches to the
fourth trochanter, a prominent ridge on the thigh bone, and pulls the thigh bone backwards when contracted. Scott Persons and
Phil Currie (2011) argued that in the tail vertebrae of
Carnotaurus, the caudal ribs did not protrude horizontally ("T-shaped"), but were angled against the vertical axis of the vertebrae, forming a "V". This would have provided additional space for a caudofemoralis muscle larger than in any other theropod—the muscle mass was calculated at per leg. Therefore,
Carnotaurus could have been one of the fastest large theropods. While the caudofemoralis muscle was enlarged, the
epaxial muscles situated above the caudal ribs would have been proportionally smaller. These muscles, called the
longissimus and
spinalis muscle, were responsible for tail movement and stability. To maintain tail stability in spite of reduction of these muscles, the caudal ribs bear forward projecting processes interlocking the vertebrae with each other and with the pelvis, stiffening the tail. As a consequence, the ability to make tight turns would have been diminished, because the hip and tail had to be turned simultaneously, unlike in other theropods.
Brain and senses Cerroni and Paulina-Carabajal, in 2019, used a CT scan to study the endocranial cavity that contained the brain. The volume of the endocranial cavity was 168.8 cm3, although the brain would only have filled a fraction of this space. The authors used two different brain size estimates, assuming a brain size of 50% and 37% of the endocranial cavity, respectively. This results in a
reptile encephalization quotient (a measure of intelligence) larger than that of the related
Majungasaurus but smaller than in
tyrannosaurids. The
pineal gland, which produces
hormones, might have been smaller than in other abelisaurids, as indicated by a low dural expansion – a space on top of the forebrain in which the pineal gland is thought to have been located. The
olfactory bulbs, which housed the sense of smell, were large, while the
optic lobes, which were responsible for sight, were relatively small. This indicates that the sense of smell might have been better developed than the sense of sight, while the opposite is the case in modern birds. The front end of the olfactory tracts and bulbs were curved downwards, a feature only shared by
Indosaurus; in other abelisaurids, these structures were oriented horizontally. As hypothesized by Cerroni and Paulina-Carabajal, this downward-curvature, together with the large size of the bulbs, might indicate that
Carnotaurus relied more on the sense of smell than other abelisaurids. The
flocculus, a brain lobe thought to be correlated with gaze stabilization (coordination between eyes and body), was large in
Carnotaurus and other South American abelisaurids. This could indicate that these forms frequently used quick movements of the head and body. Hearing might have been poorly developed in
Carnotaurus and other abelisaurids, as indicated by the short
lagena of the
inner ear. The hearing range was estimated to be below 3 kHz. ==Age and paleoenvironment==