The
Celebration of Id has two verses from a
ghazal of Hafez inscribed by the painter on top of the palace: This verse was initially composed by Hafez circa 1376, for his ruler the
Muzaffarid king
Shah Shoja. The ruler enthroned in the center of the 16th century painting is certainly the Safavid
Shah Tahmasp. On the throne, at the feet of his ruler,
Sultan Muhammad added his signature: "The work (
amal) of Sultan Muhammad of
'Eraq". Various adjectives fit for a king surround the signature: victory (
fatḥ), [divine] assistance (
nuṣrat), good fortune (
dawlat), triumph (
pirūzī), and [long] life (
`umr).
"Sam Mirza" doorway inscription Later, the manuscript apparently entered into the possession of Tahmasp's brother
Sam Mirza. Sam Mirza added his name over the doorway. The added text reads "al-Hādī Abu’l-Muzaffar Sam Mīrzā" ("The Guide, the Victorious Father, Sam Mīrzā"). "The Guide" was normally a title reserved to
Shah Ismail himself or to Tahmasp, and the title "Abu’l-Muzaffar" belonged to Tahmasp as well (whereas Sam Mirza used "Abu’l-Nasr" in his titulature). According to Soudavar, the script of this sentence above the doorway is markedly inferior to that of the inscription on top of the palace: it was hastily written, and lacks the fine black outline. It is also not properly centered, and even starts outside of the miniature, as the first two letter ("al") are written in the margin. It was not written in the hand of Sultan-Muhammad, and is a later addition. The original inscription must therefore have belonged to Shah Tahmasp, and was modified later. Also, the other elements in the painting (iconography and verses), make it clear that the subject of the painting is the king, whereas Sam Mirza was only a young Governor of Herat (14 years old), under the tutelage of
Hoseyn Khan Shamlu when the miniatures were made. Only later in 1534 did Huseyn Khan Shamlu try to topple Shah Tahmasp and replace him with Sam Mirza, during the wars with the Ottomans. The inscription may suggest some attempt at symbolical usurpation, Sam Mirza trying to put himself in the royal place of his brother Shah Tahmasp, claiming for himself both the titulatures of Shah Ismail and Shah Tashmap. Earlier authors, such as Gray (1961) or Stuart Gary Welch (1976) used to attribute the painting as a depiction of Sam Mirza and his court without further questioning the validity of the inscription over the doorway. ==
Allegory of drunkenness==