The consensus view, based on several
cladistic analyses, is that
Caudipteryx is a basal (primitive) member of the
Oviraptorosauria, and the oviraptorosaurians are non-avian theropod dinosaurs. Halszka Osmólska
et al. (2004) ran a cladistic analysis that came to a different conclusion. They found that the most birdlike features of oviraptorids actually place the whole clade within Aves itself, meaning that
Caudipteryx is both an oviraptorid and a bird. In their analysis, birds evolved from more primitive theropods, and one lineage of birds became flightless, re-evolved some primitive features, and gave rise to the oviraptorids. This analysis was persuasive enough to be included in paleontological textbooks like Benton's
Vertebrate Paleontology (2005). The view that
Caudipteryx was secondarily flightless is also preferred by
Gregory S. Paul,
Lü et al., and
Maryańska et al. Others, such as Stephen Czerkas and
Larry Martin have concluded that
Caudipteryx is not a
theropod dinosaur at all. They believe that
Caudipteryx, like all
maniraptorans, is a flightless bird, and that birds evolved from non-dinosaurian
archosaurs. A weighted cladogram from 2014, using TNT, is shown below. }}
Relationship with birds Because
Caudipteryx has clear and unambiguously pennaceous feathers, like modern birds, and because several cladistic analyses have consistently recovered it as a non-avian oviraptorid dinosaur, it provided, at the time of its description, the clearest and most succinct evidence that birds evolved from dinosaurs.
Lawrence Witmer stated: "The presence of unambiguous feathers in an unambiguously non-avian theropod has the rhetorical impact of an atomic bomb, rendering any doubt about the theropod relationships of birds ludicrous." Jones
et al. (2000) found that
Caudipteryx was a bird based on a mathematical comparison of the body proportions of flightless birds and non-avian theropods. Dyke and Norell (2005) criticized this result for flaws in their mathematical methods, and produced results of their own which supported the opposite conclusion. Other researchers not normally involved in the debate over bird origins, such as Zhou, acknowledged that the true affinities of
Caudipteryx were debatable. ==Paleobiology==