Upon its release,
Charleston, SC 1966 received generally positive reviews from most music critics. At
Metacritic, which assigns a
normalized rating out of 100 to reviews from mainstream critics, the album received an
average score of 68, based on 10 reviews, which indicates "generally favorable reviews". Matt Bjorke with Roughstock gave it a four star rating, called all of the tracks on the record "radio ready" and said "
Charleston, SC 1966 may not feature many outright old school traditional tunes like
Learn to Live featured but in many ways the album features quite a few songs that show off a more 'traditional' feel than most mainstream country albums do nowadays and to be perfectly honest, it’s a sound and feel that suits Darius Rucker like a glove. Sarah Rodman with
The Boston Globe favored the album over its predecessor saying it "surpasses its predecessor on the strength of more vibrant and charming tunes." Brian Mansfield with
USA Today called it a "fine-sounding country album" and said that with the release, "he seems to have made his primary home in country music". Mario Tarradell with
The Dallas Morning News gave it a "B" rating, calling it a "solid follow-up" to
Learn to Live, and said that he "ably captures the nuances of mainstream country".
Stephen Thomas Erlewine with
Allmusic called it "a gleaming example of polished, pressed, modern country-pop" and gave it a three star rating. Rick Moore with
American Songwriter gave it three and a half stars, saying "
Charleston, SC 1966 doesn’t break any rules or new ground, and probably wasn’t meant to [...] it’s obviously calculated to appeal to the million people who bought
Learn to Live, so if you’re one of them, you’ll probably like this record." Michael McCall with the
Associated Press called the tracks on the release "too radio friendly" and said that "his new focus loses the creative sweep and emotional force that made his first country album so compelling. Jonathan Keefe with
Slant Magazine gave it a two and a half star rating, calling the material "banal". ==Commercial performance==