REACH Influencing
REACH was a priority for ChemSec until the regulation was passed in 2006. ChemSec argued in favour of stricter controls on chemical use on the basis of commercial advantages and scientific evidence of benefits to human and environmental health. ChemSec's research with the
Global Development and Environmental Institute at
Tufts University, Boston, into the costs of implementing REACH formed the basis of a 2004
Nordic Council of Ministers study, which concluded that the chemicals industry was overestimating the costs of changes to the new chemicals regulation in Europe. In 2006, the
European Parliament commissioned ChemSec to produce a further report on the implications of REACH for
developing countries. The report concluded that concerns about the potential for REACH to interfere with trade patterns were largely unfounded.
RoHS In 2010, ChemSec secured support from some manufacturers for their proposals to restrict the use of
brominated flame retardants and
PVC in electronic goods under the RoHS Directive. Although the EU rejected immediate restriction of specific substances, new measures to restrict substances likely to produce hazardous pollutants were included in the recast of the legislation.
Endocrine disrupting chemicals In 2011, ChemSec proposed a set of chemicals whose use should be legally restricted for their potential to disrupt
hormone signalling. The move, via ChemSec's SIN List initiative, coincides with EU plans over 2011–2012 to develop accepted regulatory criteria for
endocrine disruptors (EDCs) and further restrict their use. ==Substitution of hazardous chemicals==