The film was successful in Japan on its initial release, but the Japan Teachers Union, which had commissioned the film, criticized its "outsider" view of the physical and personal devastation of the bombing and especially the lack of clear political and social criticism, concentrating instead on the stories of a few individuals. The union then commissioned another film,
Hiroshima (released in 1953), by director
Hideo Sekigawa, which was far more graphic in its depiction of the bombing's aftermath and far more critical of both American and Japanese leaders who had brought about the disaster.
Sight & Sound wrote: "
Gembaku No Ko ... is a sincere and thoughtful attempt to come to dramatic terms with a subject of horrifying urgency. Though its responses are direct and genuine, however, it is not a very imaginative or, in itself, memorable work. The dramatic framework is a good one ... The mood is gentle and deliberately restrained. Behind the individual situations, the young director, Kaneto Shindo, aims to sketch in the general related patterns of everyday life in a broken city, and each thread leads back, directly or indirectly, to August 6th, 1945. This is a city of orphans, of bereavements, of the "illness." Nothing – except a formalised sequence, set to choral music, evoking the nightmare of the bomb itself, a sunflower instantaneously scorched and withered, bodies naked and mutilated, the swelling pillar of smoke, all of which stands out from the rest as a too conscious set-piece – is overstressed. Yet what is lacking is the true personal sensibility that might have made the film a work of art instead of an honourable attempt at one." In 1959, film historian
Donald Richie perceived a major weakness in the film, its "coupling of the most lifelike naturalism with truly excessive sentimentality", but emphasized that "it showed the aftermath of the bomb without any vicious polemic".
Children of Hiroshima was met with positive reviews on its American debut in 2011. In a review of the film, where he also comments on its place in Kaneto Shindō's career,
The New York Times critic
A.O. Scott remarks: "Mr. Shindo combines austerity and sensuality to stirring, sometimes mesmerizing effect. The beauty of the compositions in
Children of Hiroshima — the clarity of focus, the graceful balance within the frames — provides some relief from the grimness of his subject. […] He contemplates Japan’s wartime experience with regret, rather than indignation". In
The Village Voice, J. Hoberman called it "a somber melodrama" which lacks in subtlety but has "the capacity to wound". Film scholar Alexander Jacoby resumed, "it remains one of Shindo’s most moving films, and a testament to the anti-war spirit that took root in Japan after its defeat". The film holds a score of 86/100 on review aggregation site
Metacritic. ==Themes and analysis==