Boys as young as four climbed hot
flues that could be as narrow as . Work was dangerous and they could get jammed in the flue, suffocate or burn to death. As soot is
carcinogenic, and as the boys slept under the soot sacks and were rarely washed, they were prone to
chimney sweeps' carcinoma. From 1775 onward, there was increasing concern for the welfare of the boys, and
Acts of Parliament were passed to restrict, and in 1875 to stop this usage.
Lord Shaftesbury, the philanthropist, led the later campaign. Chimneys started to appear in Britain around 1200 (with the oldest extant example of a chimney in Britain being in the keep of
Conisbrough Castle in
Yorkshire, dating from 1185 AD), when they replaced the open fire burning in the middle of the one-room house. At first there would be one heated room in the building and chimneys would be large. Over the next four hundred years, rooms became specialised and smaller and many were heated.
Sea coal started to replace wood, and it deposited a layer of flammable creosote in the inside surface of the flue, and caked it with soot. Whereas before the chimney was a vent for the smoke, now the plume of hot gas was used to suck air into the fire, and this required narrower flues. Even so, boys rarely climbed chimneys before the
Great Fire of London, when
building regulations were put in place and the design of chimneys was altered. The new chimneys were often angular and narrow, and the usual dimension of the flue in domestic properties was . The master sweep was unable to climb into such small spaces himself and employed climbing boys to go up the chimneys to dislodge the soot. The boys often 'buffed it', that is, climbed naked, propelling themselves by their knees and elbows which were scraped raw. They were often put up hot chimneys, and sometimes up chimneys that were alight in order to extinguish the fire. Chimneys with sharp angles posed a particular hazard. These boys were apprenticed to the sweep, and from 1778 until 1875 a series of laws attempted to regulate their working conditions, and many firsthand accounts were documented and published in parliamentary reports. From about 1803, there was an alternative method of brushing chimneys, but sweeps and their clients resisted the change, preferring climbing boys to the new humane sweeping machines. Compulsory education was established in 1870 by the
Elementary Education Act 1870 but it was a further five years before legislation was put in place to license chimney sweeps and finally prevent boys being sent up chimneys.
Climbing boys , designed to show the contrast between mechanical sweeping and children sweeping chimneys.{{bulleted list The climbing boys, and sometimes girls, were technically called ''chimney sweeps' apprentices
, and were apprenticed to a master sweep'', who, being an adult, was too large to fit into a chimney or flue. He would be paid by the parish to teach orphans or
paupers the craft. They were totally reliant on him: they or their guardians had signed
papers of indenture, in front of a magistrate, which bound them to him until they were adults. It was the duty of the
Poor Law guardians to apprentice as many
children of the workhouse in their care as possible, so as to reduce costs to the parish. The master sweep had duties: to teach the craft and its mysteries, to provide the apprentice with a second suit of clothes, to have him cleaned once a week, allow him to attend church, and not send him up chimneys that were on fire. An apprentice agreed to obey his master. Once his seven-year-long apprenticeship was completed, he would become a
journeyman sweep, and would continue to work for a master sweep of his choice. Other apprentices were sold on to the sweep, or sold by their parents. Prices ranged from 7
shillings to 4
guineas. It was generally agreed that six was a good age to train a boy. Though Lord Shaftesbury once encountered one of the age of four, they were considered to be too weak. Using his back, elbows, and knees, he would shimmy up the flue in the manner of a caterpillar An apprentice would do four or five chimneys a day. When they first started they scraped their knees and elbows, so the master would harden up their skin by standing them close to a hot fire and rubbing in strong brine using a brush. This was done each evening until the skin hardened. Another Nottingham sweep insisted they washed three times a year, for Christmas,
Whitsun, and the
Goose Fair. Sometimes, a boy would need to be persuaded to climb faster or higher up the chimney, and the master sweep would light either a small fire of straw or a
brimstone candle, to encourage him to try harder. One method to stop him from "going off" (
asphyxiating) was to send another boy up behind him to prick pins into his buttocks or the soles of his feet. Chimneys varied in size. The common flue was designed to be one and a half bricks long by one brick wide, though they often narrowed to one brick square, that is or less. Often the chimney would still be hot from the fire, and occasionally it would actually be on fire. Climbing boys risked getting stuck with their knees jammed against their chins. The harder they struggled the tighter they became wedged. They could remain in this position for many hours until they were pushed out from below or pulled out with a rope. If their struggling caused a fall of soot they would suffocate. Dead or alive, the boy had to be removed and this would be done by removing bricks from the side of the chimney. If the chimney was particularly narrow the boys would be told to "buff it", that is to do it naked; otherwise they just wore trousers and a shirt made from thick rough cotton cloth.
Health and safety concerns The conditions to which these children were subjected caused concern and societies were set up to promote mechanical means for sweeping chimneys and it is through their pamphlets that we have a better idea of what the job could entail. Here a sweep describes the fate of one boy: After passing through the chimney and descending to the second angle of the fireplace the Boy finds it completely filled with soot, which he has dislodged from the sides of the upright part. He endeavours to get through, and succeeds in doing so, after much struggling as far as his shoulders; but finding that the soot is compressed hard all around him, by his exertions, that he can recede no farther; he then endeavours to move forward, but his attempts in this respect are quite abortive; for the covering of the horizontal part of the Flue being stone, the sharp angle of which bears hard on his shoulders, and the back part of his head prevents him from moving in the least either one way or the other. His face, already covered with a climbing cap, and being pressed hard in the soot beneath him, stops his breath. In this dreadful condition he strives violently to extricate himself, but his strength fails him; he cries and groans, and in a few minutes he is suffocated. An alarm is then given, a brick-layer is sent for, an aperture is perforated in the Flue, and the boy is extracted, but found lifeless. In a short time an inquest is held, and a Coroner's Jury returns a verdict of "Accidental Death". These, however, were not the only
occupational hazards that chimney sweeps suffered. In the 1817 report to Parliament, witnesses reported that climbing boys suffered from general neglect, and exhibited stunted growth and deformity of the spine, legs, and arms, which were thought to be caused by being required to remain in abnormal positions for long periods of time before their bones had hardened. The knees and ankle joints were the most affected. Sores and inflammation of the eyelids that could lead to loss of sight, were slow in healing because the boy kept rubbing them. Bruises and burns were obvious hazards of having to work in an overheated environment. Cancer of the scrotum was found only in chimney sweeps, so was referred to as chimney sweep cancer in the teaching hospitals. Asthma and inflammation of the chest were attributed to the fact that the boys were out in all weathers.
Chimney sweeps' carcinoma, which the sweeps called soot wart, did not occur until the sweep was in his late teens or twenties. It has now been identified as a manifestation of
scrotal squamous cell carcinoma. It was reported in 1775 by
Sir Percival Pott in climbing boys or chimney sweepers. It is the first
industrially related cancer to be found. Potts described it: It is a disease which always makes it first attack on the inferior part of the
scrotum where it produces a superficial, painful ragged ill-looking sore with hard rising edges ... in no great length of time it pervades the skin,
dartos and the membranes of the scrotum, and seizes the
testicle, which it inlarges [
sic], hardens and renders truly and thoroughly distempered. Whence it makes its way up the
spermatic process into the
abdomen. He also comments on the life of the boys: The fate of these people seems peculiarly hard ... they are treated with great brutality ... they are thrust up narrow and sometimes hot chimnies, [
sic] where they are bruised burned and almost suffocated; and when they get to
puberty they become ... liable to a most noisome, painful and fatal disease. The carcinogen was thought to be
coal tar, possibly containing some
arsenic. There were many deaths caused by accidents, frequently caused by the boy becoming jammed in the flue of a heated chimney, where he could suffocate or be burned to death. Sometimes a second boy would be sent to help and, on occasions would suffer the same fate.
Regulation In 1788, the
Chimney Sweepers Act 1788 (long title: An Act for the Better Regulation of Chimney Sweepers and their Apprentices) was passed, to limit a sweeper to six apprentices, at least eight years old, but lacked enforcement. It introduced the Apprenticeship Cap badge. The Act had been partially inspired by the interest in climbing boys shown by
Jonas Hanway, and his two publications ''The State of Chimney Sweepers' Young Apprentices
(1773) and later Sentimental History of Chimney Sweeps in London and Westminster'' (1785). He asserted that while Parliament was exercised with the
abolition of slavery in the new world, it was ignoring the slavery imposed on climbing boys. He looked to
Edinburgh,
Scotland, where sweeps were regulated by the police, climbing was not allowed and chimneys were swept by the master sweep himself pulling bundles of rags up and down the chimney. He did not see how climbing chimneys could be considered a valid apprenticeship, as the only skill obtained was that of climbing chimneys, which did not lead to future employment. Hanway advocated that Christianity should be brought into the boys' lives and lobbied for
Sunday schools for the boys. The
Lords removed the proposed clause that master sweeps should be licensed, and before
civil registration, there was no way that anyone could check if a child was actually eight. The same year, David Porter, a humane master sweep, sent a petition to Parliament, and in 1792 published
Considerations of the Present State of Chimney Sweepers with some Observations on the Act of Parliament intended for their Relief and Regulation. Though concerned for the boys' welfare, he believed that boys were more efficient than any of the new mechanical cleaning machines. In 1796 a society was formed, Bettering the Conditions of the Poor, and they encouraged the reading of Hanway's and Porter's tracts. They had influential members and royal patronage from
George III. A Friendly Society for the Protection and Education of Chimney-Sweepers' Boys had been established in 1800. In 1803, it was thought by some that a mechanical brush could replace a climbing boy (the Human brush), and members of the 1796 society formed The London Society for Superseding the Necessity for Employing Climbing Boys; The
Chimney Sweepers Act 1834 contained many of the needed regulations. It stated that an apprentice must express himself in front of a magistrate that he was "willing and desirous". Masters must not take on boys under the age of fourteen. The master could only have six apprentices and an apprentice could not be lent to another master. Boys under fourteen who were already apprenticed must wear brass cap badges on a leather cap. Apprentices were not allowed to climb flues to extinguish fires. Street cries were regulated. The act was resisted by the master sweeps, and the general public believed that property would be at risk if the flues were not cleaned by a climbing boy. Also that year, building regulations relating to the construction of chimneys were changed. The
Chimney Sweepers and Chimneys Regulation Act 1840 made it illegal for anyone under the age of 21 to sweep chimneys. It was widely ignored. Attempts were made in 1852 and 1853 to reopen the issue, another enquiry was convened and more evidence was taken. There was no
bill. The Chimney Sweepers Regulation Act 1864, c. 37, tightened controls significantly, by authorising fines and imprisonment for master sweeps who were ignoring the law, giving the police the power of arrest on suspicion and authorising
Board of Trade inspections of new and remodelled chimneys. Lord Shaftesbury was a main proponent of the Act. In February 1875 a twelve-year-old boy, George Brewster, was sent up the
Fulbourn Hospital chimneys by his master, William Wyer. He stuck and smothered. The entire wall had to be pulled down to get him out and although he was still alive, he died shortly afterward. There was a coroner's inquest which returned a verdict of
manslaughter. Wyer was sentenced to six months' imprisonment with hard labour. Lord Shaftesbury seized on the incident to press his campaign again. He wrote a series of letters to
The Times and in September 1875 pushed another bill through Parliament which finally stopped the practice of sending boys up chimneys. The
Chimney Sweepers Act 1875 required chimney sweepers "to be authorized by the police to carry on their businesses in the district", thus providing the legal means to enforce all previous legislation. ==United States==