Austin Chronicle wrote that
Chistabel "poses perceptual and emotional challenges to his viewers", and that within the film "sexual symbolism is dense and not for all tastes."
Phil Hall of
Film Threat panned the film, writing "for those who actively loathe experimental cinema, please avoid James Fotopoulos’ “Christabel” at all costs. And for those who actively love experimental cinema...well, the same advice applies", expanding that as a “loose adaptation of the poem by Samuel Taylor Coleridge, If this adaptation was any looser, it would fall off the screen." He found the film to be both plotless and pointless, and one that "offers absolutely nothing which could even vaguely or charitably be defined as art, imagination or stimulation." Conversely,
Chicago Reader wrote "Chicagoan James Fotopoulos has garnered critical acclaim", and that of his film
Christabel, it was a "creepy, beautiful" feature, and of the film's screening at the 2002
New York Underground Film Festival,
The Christian Science Monitor felt that it was a "frontrunner in the festival's avant-garde lineup", with
Independent Film & Video Monthly writing
Cristabel would "set festivals ablaze". ==References==