Contemporary reviews Reviews by film critics were overwhelmingly positive at the time.
Variety led off its review with: "An elegant example of super film making and a big money picture. This is a spectacular western away from all others. It holds action, sentiment, sympathy, thrills and comedy – and 100% clean. Radio Pictures has a corker in 'Cimarron'." The review went on to praise the actors, particularly Dix and Oliver, as well as the direction, stating, "Wesley Ruggles apparently gets the full credit for this splendid and heavy production. His direction misses nothing in the elaborate scenes, as well as in the usual film making procedure." The magazine specifically pointed out the quality of the make-up in the aging of the principal players, who have to go through forty years on-screen.
Mordaunt Hall of
The New York Times also gave the film a stellar review, calling it: "A graphic and engrossing screen conception of Edna Ferber's widely read novel ...", and also praised the handling of the passage of time in this epic. Hall also singled out the performance of Dunne.
Motion Picture Magazine raved: "A great and worthy effort, this transcription of early Oklahoma life will be hailed as one of the high-spots of the year. It has everything. RKO seems to have placed no restrictions upon making it a lavish, bona-fide epic."
John Mosher of
The New Yorker praised the "great care" that had been taken with the historical accuracy of the film's visual details, that he thought "as good as anything that has come out of Hollywood, and because of this expertness the film gains especial value". He also wrote that Richard Dix was "certainly at his best in this role". His only criticisms concerned the second half of the film, that he thought had "sagging moments" and an ending that was too abrupt.
The Evening Independent called it "a notable addition to the small list of pictures that the years have given to the American theater. For in
Cimarron is vested stirring drama, stark beauty, daring and adventure on a plane that is seldom seen on the screen." The
West Seattle Herald declared that it was "even more powerful than the great story read by millions in America.
Cimarron the picture is all that is gripping in
Cimarron the story. Spectacular scenes abound in this production." Elizabeth Yeaman of the
Hollywood Daily Citizen saw the film as a new type of history, writing that, "Like history, the picture has moments of thrilling glory and moments of repetition and daily routine.
Cimarron does not follow the rules of story construction... It is, in short, a graphic interpretation of a portion of history, the history of the state of Oklahoma from the time of the first great land rush until the present."
Retrospective reviews More recent appraisals of the film have not been as positive. Steve Evans of
DVD Verdict wrote in 2006, "Seen with contemporary eyes, the film is badly dated, slow moving, and pocked with racist caricatures....The recreation of the great 1889 Oklahoma Land Rush remains an exciting spectacle....Unfortunately, the film never manages to top this opening shot." Assessing the film in 2009,
James Berardinelli called it "an excellent study of how tastes have changed over the years. Critically lauded at the time of its release,
Cimarron was beloved by most who saw it. Eight decades later, it is frequently cited on lists of the most undeserving Academy Award winners and is rightfully impugned for racist overtones and scattershot storytelling." As of September 2023,
Cimarron held a "Rotten" 52% rating on
Rotten Tomatoes, based on 33 reviews, with a
weighted average of 5.2/10. The site's consensus reads: "
Cimarron is supported by a strong performance from Irene Dunne, but uneven in basically every other regard, and riddled with potentially offensive stereotypes." ==Awards and honors==