Origins 86-DOS was created because sales of the
Seattle Computer Products 8086
computer kit, demonstrated in June 1979 and shipped in November, were languishing due to the absence of an operating system. The only software that SCP could sell with the board was Microsoft's
Standalone Disk BASIC-86, which Microsoft had developed on a prototype of SCP's hardware. SCP wanted to offer the 8086-version of
CP/M that Digital Research had initially announced for November 1979, but it was delayed and its release date was uncertain. This was not the first time Digital Research had lagged behind hardware developments; two years earlier it had been slow to adapt CP/M for new
floppy disk formats and
hard disk drives. In April 1980, SCP assigned 24-year-old
Tim Paterson to develop a substitute for
CP/M-86. Using a CP/M-80 manual as reference, Paterson modeled 86-DOS after its architecture and interfaces, but adapted to meet the requirements of Intel's 8086
16-bit processor, for easy (and partially automated) source-level translatability of the many existing
8-bit CP/M programs; porting them to either DOS or CP/M-86 was about equally difficult and eased by the fact that Intel had already published a method that could be used to automatically translate software from the
Intel 8080 processor, for which CP/M had been designed, to the new 8086 instruction set. At the same time he made a number of changes and enhancements to address what he saw as CP/M's shortcomings. CP/M
cached file system information in memory for speed, but this required a user to force an update to a disk before removing it; if the user forgot, the disk would become corrupt. Paterson took the safer, but slower approach of updating the disk with each operation. CP/M's
PIP command, which copied files, supported several special file names that referred to hardware devices such as
printers and
communication ports. Paterson built these names into the operating system as
device files so that any program could use them. He gave his copying program the more intuitive name
COPY. Rather than implementing
CP/M's file system, he drew on Microsoft Standalone Disk BASIC-86's
File Allocation Table (FAT)
file system. By mid-1980 SCP advertised 86-DOS, priced at for owners of its 8086-board and for others. It touted the software's ability to read
Zilog Z80 source code from a CP/M disk and translate it to 8086 source code, and promised that only "minor hand correction and optimization" was needed to produce 8086 binaries.
IBM interest In October 1980,
IBM was developing what would become the original
IBM Personal Computer. CP/M was by far the most popular operating system in use at the time, and IBM felt that it needed CP/M in order to compete. IBM's representatives visited Digital Research and discussed
licensing with Digital Research's licensing representative,
Dorothy Kildall (née McEwen), who hesitated to sign IBM's
non-disclosure agreement. Although the NDA was later accepted, Digital Research would not accept IBM's proposal of in exchange for as many copies as IBM could sell, insisting on the usual
royalty-based plan. In later discussions between IBM and
Bill Gates, Gates mentioned the existence of 86-DOS, and IBM representative Jack Sams told him to get a license for it.
Creation of PC DOS Microsoft purchased a non-exclusive license for 86-DOS from Seattle Computer Products in December 1980 for . In May 1981, it hired Tim Paterson to port the system to the IBM PC, which used the slower and less expensive
Intel 8088 processor and had its own specific family of peripherals. IBM watched the developments daily, submitting over 300
change requests before it accepted the product and wrote the user manual for it. In July 1981, a month before the PC's release, Microsoft purchased all rights to 86-DOS from SCP for . It met IBM's main criteria: it looked like CP/M, and it was easy to adapt existing 8-bit CP/M programs to run under it, notably thanks to the
TRANS command which would translate source files from 8080 to 8086 machine instructions. Microsoft licensed 86-DOS to IBM, and it became PC DOS 1.0. This license also permitted Microsoft to sell DOS to other companies, which it did. The deal was spectacularly successful, and SCP later claimed in court that Microsoft had concealed its relationship with IBM in order to purchase the operating system cheaply. SCP ultimately received a million settlement payment.
Intellectual property dispute When Digital Research founder
Gary Kildall examined PC DOS and found that it duplicated CP/M's programming interface, he wanted to sue IBM, which at the time claimed that PC DOS was its own product. However, Digital Research's attorney did not believe that the relevant law was clear enough to sue. Nonetheless, Kildall confronted IBM and persuaded them to offer CP/M-86 with the PC in exchange for a release of liability. Controversy has continued to surround the similarity between the two systems. Perhaps the most sensational claim came from
Jerry Pournelle, who said that Kildall personally demonstrated to him that DOS contained CP/M code by entering a command in DOS that displayed Kildall's name, but Pournelle never revealed the command and nobody has come forward to corroborate his story. A 2004 book about Kildall says that he used such an encrypted message to demonstrate that other manufacturers had copied CP/M, but does not say that he found the message in DOS; instead Kildall's memoir (a source for the book) pointed to the well-known interface similarity. Paterson insists that the 86-DOS software was his original work and has denied referring to or otherwise using CP/M code while writing it. After the 2004 book appeared, he sued the authors and publishers for
defamation. The court ruled in
summary judgment that no defamation had occurred, as the book's claims were opinions based on research or were not provably false.
Versions ==Features==