Broadcasting standards breaches In October 2009, the Broadcasting Standards Authority (BSA) upheld complaints against
Close Up for breaching standards of good taste and decency, liquor promotion, and children’s interests in a May 2009 item featuring a group of duck hunters in the
Wairarapa. The broadcast showed hunters mixing alcohol and firearms, visibly promoting beer brands, and engaging in crude antics—including one man diving nude onto a blow-up doll—all during a 7pm timeslot without warnings. The BSA found that the item glamorised unsafe and inappropriate behaviour, failed to consider the presence of child viewers, and presented liquor consumption in a way that was not socially responsible. TVNZ was ordered to broadcast a summary of the decision, pay $1,500 in costs to
Lion Nathan Ltd, and $3,500 to the Crown. In March 2011, the
Broadcasting Standards Authority (BSA) upheld a complaint against
Close Up for breaching standards of good taste, decency, and children’s interests in an August 2010 broadcast featuring pornographic actress Nina Hartley. The segment included sexually explicit clips from Hartley’s adult films—such as simulated sex acts and visible nudity—aired during family viewing time with only a brief viewer warning. While TVNZ had acknowledged the breach and apologised, the BSA found its response insufficient given the seriousness of the content, which it said exceeded acceptable limits for 7pm current affairs programming. The Authority ordered TVNZ to broadcast a summary of the decision and pay $3,000 in costs to the Crown. In May 2014, the BSA upheld a complaint by a New Zealand doctor who was the subject of a 2012
Close Up broadcast investigating his unapproved
stem cell treatments for
multiple sclerosis. The programme included covert footage filmed during a patient consultation, which the Authority found breached the doctor’s privacy and treated him unfairly. The doctor was not given a reasonable opportunity to respond before the broadcast, and the raw footage was destroyed, undermining TVNZ’s ability to justify the use of a hidden camera on public interest grounds. The BSA ordered TVNZ to pay $5,500 in legal costs to the complainant. ==References==