Comet nuclei, at ~1 km to at times tens of kilometers, could not be
resolved by telescopes. Even current
giant telescopes would give just a few pixels on target, assuming nuclei were not obscured by comae when near Earth. An understanding of the nucleus, versus the phenomenon of the coma, had to be deduced, from multiple lines of evidence.
"Flying sandbank" The "flying sandbank" model, first proposed in the late-1800s, posits a comet as a swarm of bodies, not a discrete object at all. Activity is the loss of both volatiles, and population members. This model was championed in midcentury by
Raymond Lyttleton, along with an origin. As the Sun passed through interstellar nebulosity, material would clump in wake eddies. Some would be lost, but some would remain in heliocentric orbits. The weak capture explained long, eccentric, inclined comet orbits. Ices
per se were lacking; volatiles were stored by adsorption on grains.
"Dirty snowball" Beginning in the 1950s,
Fred Lawrence Whipple published his "icy conglomerate" model. This was soon popularized as "dirty snowball." Comet orbits had been
determined quite precisely, yet comets were at times recovered "off-schedule," by as much as days. Early comets could be explained by a "resisting medium"—such as
"the aether", or the cumulative action of
meteoroids against the front of the comet(s). But comets could return both early and late. Whipple argued that a gentle thrust from asymmetric emissions (now "nongravitational forces") better explained comet timing. This required that the emitter have cohesive strength – a single, solid nucleus with some proportion of volatiles. Lyttleton continued publishing flying-sandbank works as late as 1972. The death knell for the flying sandbank was Halley's Comet.
Vega 2 and
Giotto images showed a single body, emitting through a small number of jets.
"Icy dirtball" It has been a long time since comet nuclei could be imagined as frozen snowballs. Whipple had already postulated a separate crust and interior. Before Halley's 1986 apparition, it appeared that an exposed ice surface would have some finite lifetime, even behind a coma. Halley's nucleus was
predicted to be dark, not bright, due to preferential destruction/escape of gases, and retention of refractories. The term
dust mantling has been in common use since more than 35 years. The Halley results exceeded even these—comets are not merely dark, but among the darkest objects in the Solar System Furthermore, prior dust estimates were severe undercounts. Both finer grains and larger pebbles appeared in spacecraft detectors, but not ground telescopes. The volatile fraction also included organics, not merely water and other gases. Dust-ice ratios appeared much closer than thought. Extremely low densities (0.1 to ) were derived. The nucleus was still assumed to be majority-ice, and fragile on micro- and macro-scales. Refractory-to-ice ratios are much higher, at least 3:1, possibly ~5:1, ~6:1, This is a full reversal from the dirty snowball model. The Rosetta science team has coined the term "mineral organices," for minerals and organics with a minor fraction of ices.
Manx comets,
Damocloids, and
active asteroids demonstrate that there may be no
bright line separating the two categories of objects. == Origin ==