Recalls and contamination In February 2005, the agency announced the discovery of the
dye Sudan I in
Worcester sauce, prompting a mass
product recall of over 400 products that used the sauce as a
flavouring. On 31 March 2006, it published its "Survey of benzene levels in soft drinks", which tested 150 products and found that four contained
benzene levels above the
World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines for drinking water. The Agency asked for these to be removed from sale. The Food Standards Agency also imposed restrictions on the
sheep trade because of the consequences of the 1986
Chernobyl catastrophe, which were repealed in March 2012.
Children's advertising The FSA pushed for stricter rules on TV
advertising to children of foods high in salt, sugar and fat and devised a nutritional profiling system to measure the balance of benefit and detriment in individual food products. In 2007, the UK TV regulator
Ofcom introduced restrictions on advertising of products that scored poorly under the scheme.
Food poisoning The FSA first established targets for reducing food poisoning in July 2000. In June 2002, and re-released in June 2006, the FSA conducted an advertising campaign on British television, highlighting the danger of
food poisoning caused by
barbecues. The advert, intended to shock viewers, showed sausages sizzling on a barbecue, looking to the viewer as if they are cooked. However, when a pair of tongs pick up one of these sausages, it falls apart, and reveals pink, uncooked meat in the middle. To emphasise the risk of
diarrhoea and
vomiting caused by food poisoning, the song "
When Will I See You Again" by
The Three Degrees is played in the background.
Dean Review In 2005,
Brenda Dean carried out an
independent review of the Food Standards Agency. The report made 22 recommendations, all of which were accepted by the Food Standards Agency board. Dean concluded: My overwhelming impression, having undertaken this Review, is of an organisation that has been extremely conscious of the importance of fulfilling the very serious responsibilities of changing both the perception and the reality of food safety in the UK. It has done well in taking forward the experiences, good and bad, of the previous regime, to begin building its own reputation. Most stakeholders agreed that the Agency has made significant progress towards improving food safety, gaining public confidence in food safety, and creating a modern culture in which it is the norm for procedures, information, consultation and decision-making to be in the public domain and to involve external stakeholders. There was overwhelming support for the Agency's policy of basing decisions on scientific evidence, and for this policy to be maintained and developed further. The vast majority of stakeholders believe the Agency to be independent and to act independently, with general recognition that decisions are based on scientific evidence. There was general support for the Agency amongst all stakeholder groups, both in terms of the objectives of the Agency, and the way in which the Agency has approached and undertaken its responsibilities. One principal criticism, identified in the report, was (Recommendation 20): It is clear that many stakeholders believe the Agency has already made policy decisions on GM foods and organic foods and is not open to further debate. The Agency must address the perceptions of these stakeholders who have now formed views of the Agency founded on their belief that the basis upon which the Agency's policy decisions were made was flawed.
Food Hygiene Rating Scheme (FHRS) A food hygiene rating scheme has been deployed by the Food Standards Agency for all food businesses. Ratings are available at the business premises and online. Following a meeting in Cardiff, the FSA plans to make audit reports as widely available as possible for the public, following the example of Norwich City Council. According to Terence Collins, FSA's Director of communication, the reason behind this decision is to make ratings simple and easily understood for every single business. Apart from Scotland which is under a very simple Food Hygiene Information Scheme, the FSA's Food Hygiene Rating Scheme will be tested throughout United Kingdom. As a result, ratings will range from 0 (improvement urgently needed) to 5 (very good), and may be displayed on a certificate. This information will also be made available online. Rating primary meat processing plants is the next step forward for the FSA, as meat audit are currently only available through Freedom of Information requests. The local authority in
Rutland is believed to the only one which has not accepted the scheme. == Chairperson and advisory committees ==