The primary concern of the CDAAA was to ensure America's national security during the Second World War. It believed the best strategy for this was the provision of economic and material support to its allies, especially
Britain's campaign against Nazi Germany. In a statement in July 1940, White made this position clear; he argued that Britain was America's first line of defence and that, if Britain were not supported, the United States would become "the subject of an envy that would lead to attack." In spite of their interventionist advocacy, the CDAAA refused to further their aims towards a declaration of war against the Axis Powers.
Involvement in the 1940 Destroyer-for-Bases Exchange In May 1940,
Winston Churchill requested the purchase of old U.S.Navy Destroyers to bolster the British
Royal Navy.
President Franklin D. Roosevelt was hesitant to agree because of the
Neutrality Acts, which banned the shipment or sale of arms from the U.S. to any combatant nation, and the existing anti-interventionist sentiment that drove the passage of these reforms. Furthermore, this request coincided with
election year, which made Roosevelt increasingly sensitive to public opinion. In response, the CDAAA campaigned to drive popular support for the selling of military resources to Britain.
Robert Sherwood penned the provocative newspaper advertisement "Stop Hitler Now", published on 10 June 1940, which urged the American people to ask their president and congressional representatives to support maximum aid to the Allies. He argued that the conquest of Europe would leave America "alone in a barbaric world." This effort was supported by the Pershing Address on 4 August 1940, which the CDAAA organised with co-operation with the
Century Group.
John J. Pershing's comments gained significant traction from the press, with the
New York Herald Tribune printing the story as its front-page and the New York Times publishing it under the headline, "Pershing Warns U.S. to Aid Britain by Sending 50 Destroyers Now." Alongside popular mobilisation, the CDAAA pursued the legitimisation of this suggested trade by finding legal grounding from existing laws. On 11 August 1940, a document named "No Legal Bar Seen to Transfer of Destroyers" was published, which suggested that no further consent was required from Congress for Roosevelt to conduct the selling of Navy Destroyers to Britain. This was signed by Charles C. Burlingham of the New York Bar, former solicitor general Thomas D. Thatcher, former
Federal Trade Commission member George Rublee, and Dean Acheson. In the build-up to the 1940 election, the CDAAA worked to ensure that no partisan debate arose in regard to the degree of American intervention into World War Two. This was facilitated by their nonpartisan position, which allowed them to endorse both Roosevelt and
Wendel Willkie, who were both pro-interventionists. When Willkie was announced as the Republican candidate on 17 August, he didn't explicitly refer to the destroyers but did concede that the loss of the British fleet would "greatly weaken our defense" and an Atlantic dominated by Germany would be “a calamity.” On September 3, 1940, in response to popular and legal opinion swinging into his favor, Roosevelt announced the exchange of 50 U.S.warship in return for the right to lease naval and air bases in eight different British territories. This was a great success for the CDAAA. Following the election, on November 26, 1940, the CDAAA released a new statement of policy to further their aims. It included support for "the maintenance of the lifeline between Great Britain and the United States," the "assumption by Congress of greater responsibility with the President," and the repeal of "restrictive legislation."
Involvement in Lend-Lease (1941) Similar to in 1940, the CDAAA used popular pressure to exert influence over the U.S. government in favor of Lend-Lease. This was primarily directed towards its success in Congress, which they now had direct access to due to the role of their new leader, Ernest Gibson Jr., as Senator of Vermont. In 1941, Gibson presented their position in a statement of support for the bill before the House Committee on Foreign Affairs. Previous to this, he had endorsed the bill in spite of its implications on Presidential power, stating that "only large powers will serve to meet the growing threat to our safety." Meanwhile, Eichelberger used a radio debate against 1936 Republican presidential nominee
Alf Landon to appeal for bipartisan support for the bill. The CDAAA, again, provided legal support for the Lend-Lease bill. The group released a statement by
George Rublee, one of the signatories of the New York Times letter of the previous August, that specifically opposed the dictatorship charges made in the minority report of the House Foreign Affairs Committee. It states that "the Bill of Rights will still operate. This measure does not add to the powers the President already has as Commander in Chief of the Nation’s armed forces, and under which powers he could get us into war today, if he wanted to.” This help facilitated the passage of the Lend-Lease bill through Congress, which was signed into law by Roosevelt on 11 March 1941. As the passage of the Lend-Lease bill ensured maximum aid to the Allies, the CDAAA had largely fulfilled its objectives of obtaining Allied support short of war. == Opposition ==