IBM wanted a standard way to interact with
text-based user interface software, whether the screen was a
dumb terminal connected to a mainframe or a
PS/2 with
VGA graphics. CUA was a detailed specification and set strict rules about how applications should look and function. Its aim was in part to bring about harmony among
DOS applications, which until then had independently implemented different user interfaces. For example, to open a file: • In
WordPerfect, the command to open a file was , . • In
Lotus 1-2-3, a file was opened with (to open the menus), (for File), (for Retrieve). • In
Microsoft Word, a file was opened with (to open the menus), (for Transfer), (for Load). • In
WordStar, (to get to the
Opening Menu), followed by . • In
emacs, a file is opened with + followed by + (for find-file). • In
vi, use to allow commands, then to open the file browser. was often the
help key (such as
Volkswriter (1982)), but in WordPerfect, help was on instead. Some programs used to cancel an action, while some used it to complete one; WordPerfect used it to repeat a character. Some programs used to go to the end of a line, while some used it to complete filling in a form. sometimes toggled between overtype and inserting characters, but some programs used it for "paste". Thus every program had to be learned individually and its complete user interface memorised. It was a sign of expertise to have learned the UIs of dozens of applications, since a novice user facing a new program would find their existing knowledge of a similar application either of no use or actively a hindrance to understanding as learned behavior might need to be unlearned for the new application. The detailed CUA specification, published in December 1987, is 328 pages long. It has similarities to
Apple Computer's detailed
human interface guidelines (139 pages). The Apple HIG is a detailed book specifying how software for the 1984
Apple Macintosh computer should look and function. When it was first written, the Mac was new, and
graphical user interface (GUI) software was a novelty, so Apple took great pains to ensure that programs would conform to a single shared look and feel. CUA had a similar aim, but it faced the more difficult task of trying to impose this retroactively on an existing, thriving but chaotic industry, with the much more ambitious goal of unifying all UI, from personal computers to minicomputers to mainframes; and supporting both character and GUI modes, and both batch and interactive designs. By comparison, the Apple HIG only supported interactive GUI on a standalone personal computer. CUA also attempted to be a more measurable standard than the Apple HIG and had large sections formatted as checklists to measure compliance. == Description ==