Feeding P. siculus has a strong preference for the consumption of non-conspicuous prey.
Conspicuous coloration is a strong deterrent of consumption of
carabid beetles. When consuming
aposematic prey,
P. siculus throws its head back and rubs its snout on the soil. Such behavior has been attributed to the unpalatability of aposematic prey.
P. siculus is able to respond to chemical cues from some species of carabid beetles, evidence that the lizard has evolved to be able to detect the presence of dangerous chemicals in its prey.
Learning Multiple experiments confirm the ability of
P. siculus to learn a variety of different tasks.
P. siculus can be trained to remove colored caps from food-containing pods. However, there is controversy over the ability of
P. siculus to perform quantitative discrimination tasks. One experiment found that while 60% of subjects were able to distinguish between 1 and 4 items, very few were able to distinguish between 2 and 4 items, and none were able to distinguish between single objects with different surface areas. Additionally, a study has found that the more aggressive individual in a dyad spends more time basking than its less aggressive opponent. This relationship is prolonged: the individual that is more aggressive in a dyadic (one on one) encounter can make continued use of a thermally favorable environment over a long period of time. These more aggressive individuals grow faster than their less aggressive counterparts. In lizard dyads with low levels of aggression, there were smaller disparities between time spent basking. In such pairs, the two individuals may spend significant periods of time basking together. Regardless of aggression level in an initial encounter, this type of relationship was maintained between the dyad over a long period of time, demonstrating that social behavior is established quickly. However, basking behavior in isolation seemed to be replicated in the aftermath of these social encounters as well, suggesting that the relationship between sociality and basking depends on a more nuanced basis than behavior during an initial encounter.
Anti-predatory P. siculus is able to detect chemical cues of common predators and modify its behaviors appropriately.
P. siculus is also able to distinguish between scents of dangerous snakes and non-dangerous snakes. Studies have shown that
P. siculus increase tongue-flicking behavior, commonly associated with stress, when exposed to predator scents. Similarly, experiments show that running behavior, tail-vibrating behavior, starting behavior, and stationary behavior all increase when
P. siculus is exposed to predator scents than in control trials. Sudden, unpredictable starts may be more difficult to detect. Tail-waving may deflect attention of predators from the body of
P. siculus to its tail.
P. siculus can learn a training direction when operating under white polarized light with the direction of the electric field parallel to the training axis. Under blue and cyan light,
P. siculus is able to correctly orient itself under polarization axes both parallel and perpendicular to the training axis. Red light polarization completely disoriented
P. siculus under experimental conditions. Additionally, there is evidence that
P. siculus has a time-compensated celestial compass. The time-compensated mechanism does not seem to be affected by whether or not the sun is in view.
Effect of habitat on behavior A 2005 study compared seasonal and
diel behaviors of an introduced population of
P. siculus to its Italian counterparts. The activity period of
P. siculus campestris was reduced compared to
P. siculus in Rome, where lizards are active year-round. Colder mean temperatures in the New York habitat of
P. siculus campestris may explain why this population's activity is limited to the months of April through October.
P. siculus campestris was also active for fewer hours during the day compared to its Roman counterparts. The photoperiod of Long Island, New York, the home of
P. siculus campestris, is similar to that of Rome. This similarity strengthens the argument for temperature explaining the discrepancy in activity levels. == Conservation status ==