In application of
homological algebra techniques to algebraic geometry, it has been traditional since
David Hilbert (though modern terminology is different) to apply
free resolutions of
R, considered as a
graded module over the polynomial ring. This yields information about
syzygies, namely relations between generators of the ideal
I. In a classical perspective, such generators are simply the equations one writes down to define
V. If
V is a
hypersurface there need only be one equation, and for
complete intersections the number of equations can be taken as the codimension; but the general projective variety has no defining set of equations that is so transparent. Detailed studies, for example of
canonical curves and the
equations defining abelian varieties, show the geometric interest of systematic techniques to handle these cases. The subject also grew out of
elimination theory in its classical form, in which reduction modulo
I is supposed to become an algorithmic process (now handled by
Gröbner bases in practice). There are for general reasons free resolutions of
R as graded module over
K[
X0,
X1,
X2, ...,
XN]. A resolution is defined as
minimal if the image in each module morphism of
free modules :φ:
Fi →
Fi − 1 in the resolution lies in
JFi − 1, where
J is the irrelevant ideal. As a consequence of
Nakayama's lemma, φ then takes a given basis in
Fi to a minimal set of generators in
Fi − 1. The concept of
minimal free resolution is well-defined in a strong sense: unique
up to isomorphism of
chain complexes and occurring as a
direct summand in any free resolution. Since this complex is intrinsic to
R, one may define the
graded Betti numbers β
i, j as the number of grade-
j images coming from
Fi (more precisely, by thinking of φ as a matrix of homogeneous polynomials, the count of entries of that homogeneous degree incremented by the gradings acquired inductively from the right). In other words, weights in all the free modules may be inferred from the resolution, and the graded Betti numbers count the number of generators of a given weight in a given module of the resolution. The properties of these invariants of
V in a given projective embedding poses active research questions, even in the case of curves. There are examples where the minimal free resolution is known explicitly. For a
rational normal curve it is an
Eagon–Northcott complex. For
elliptic curves in projective space the resolution may be constructed as a
mapping cone of Eagon–Northcott complexes. ==Regularity==