In the
Harmonia Mensurarum (1722), Roger Cotes analysed a number of spirals and other curves, such as the
Lituus. He described the possible trajectories of a particle in an inverse-cube central force field, which are the Cotes's spirals. The analysis is based on the method in the
Principia Book 1, Proposition 42, where the path of a body is determined under an arbitrary central force, initial speed, and direction. Depending on the initial speed and direction he determines that there are 5 different "cases" (excluding the trivial ones, the circle and straight line through the centre). He notes that of the 5, "the first and the last are described by
Newton, by means of the quadrature (i.e. integration) of the hyperbola and the ellipse". Case 2 is the equiangular spiral, which is the spiral
par excellence. This has great historical significance as in Proposition 9 of the Principia Book 1, Newton proves that if a body moves along an equiangular spiral, under the action of a central force, that force must be as the inverse of the cube of the radius (even before his proof, in Proposition 11, that motion in an ellipse directed to a focus requires an inverse-square force). It has to be admitted that not all the curves conform to the usual definition of a spiral. For example, when the inverse-cube force is centrifugal (directed outwards), so that
μ 1 in this case.
Samuel Earnshaw in a book published in 1826 used the term “Cotes’ spirals”, so the terminology was in use at that time. Earnshaw clearly describes Cotes's 5 cases and unnecessarily adds a 6th, which is when the force is centrifugal (repulsive). As noted above, Cotes's included this with case 5. Following
E. T. Whittaker, whose
A Treatise on the Analytical Dynamics of Particles and Rigid Bodies (first published in 1904) only listed three of Cotes's spirals, some subsequent authors have followed suit. ==See also==