If T_1,\ldots,T_n is a finite collection of bounded operators, then (as will be proven below) :\displaystyle{\sum_{i,j} |(T_i v,T_jv)| \le \left(\max_i \sum_j \|T_i^*T_j\|^{1\over 2}\right)\left(\max_i \sum_j \|T_iT_j^*\|^{1\over 2}\right)\|v\|^2.} So under the hypotheses of the lemma, :\displaystyle{\sum_{i,j} |(T_i v,T_jv)| \le AB\|v\|^2.} It follows that :\displaystyle{\|\sum_{i=1}^n T_iv\|^2 \le AB \|v\|^2,} and that :\displaystyle{\|\sum_{i=m}^n T_iv\|^2 \le \sum_{i,j\ge m} |(T_iv,T_jv)|.} Hence, the partial sums :\displaystyle{s_n=\sum_{i=1}^n T_iv} form a
Cauchy sequence. The sum is therefore
absolutely convergent with the limit satisfying the stated inequality. To prove the inequality above set :\displaystyle{R=\sum a_{ij}T_i^*T_j} with |
aij| ≤ 1 chosen so that :\displaystyle{(Rv,v)=|(Rv,v)|=\sum |(T_iv,T_jv)|.} Then :\displaystyle{\|R\|^{2m} =\|(R^*R)^m\|\le \sum \|T_{i_1}^* T_{i_2} T_{i_3}^* T_{i_4} \cdots T_{i_{4m}}\| \le \sum \left(\|T_{i_1}^*\|\|T_{i_1}^*T_{i_2}\|\|T_{i_2}T_{i_3}^*\|\cdots \|T_{i_{4m-1}}^* T_{i_{4m}}\|\|T_{i_{4m}}\|\right)^{1\over 2}.} Hence :\displaystyle{\|R\|^{2m} \le n \cdot \max \|T_i\| \left(\max_i \sum_j \|T_i^*T_j\|^{1\over 2}\right)^{2m}\left(\max_i \sum_j \|T_iT_j^*\|^{1\over 2}\right)^{2m-1}.} Taking 2
mth roots and letting
m tend to ∞, :\displaystyle{\|R\|\le \left(\max_i \sum_j \|T_i^*T_j\|^{1\over 2}\right)\left(\max_i \sum_j \|T_iT_j^*\|^{1\over 2}\right),} which immediately implies the inequality. ==Generalization==