Early history The County Palatine of Durham emerged from the
liberty known variously as the "Liberty of
Durham", "Liberty of
St Cuthbert's Land", "The lands of St. Cuthbert between
Tyne and
Tees" or "The Liberty of Haliwerfolc", the latter translates to "district of the holy saint's folk". St. Cuthbert gained a reputation as being fiercely protective of his domain. The origins of the Liberty trace back to the year 684, when King Ecgfrith of
Northumbria bestowed a significant territory upon St. Cuthbert, following the latter's election as the Bishop of Lindisfarne. The Viking Invasions led to the shattering of the Kingdom of Northumbria into a series of successor polities. The Community of St. Cuthbert emerged as a prominent force, gaining control over expansive estates situated between the rivers Tyne and Tees, known as the Patrimony of St. Cuthbert. This territorial expansion began under the leadership of Bishop Ecgred, who acquired two substantial blocks in the south-east and south-west regions of the designated area between 830 and 845. In a strategic move in approximately 883, the diocese of Lindisfarne was translated to Chester-le-Street. This relocation was facilitated by Guthred, the Viking King of Northumbria, who granted the Community of St. Cuthbert the region between the Tyne and Wear. To this end, the Patrimony of St Cuthbert between the Tyne and Tees had emerged as buffer zone between the territories north of the Tyne, governed by the Anglian House of Bamburgh, and the Viking Kings based in York. The Liberty underwent another significant relocation in 995, when the diocese moved to Durham, a move that was accompanied by additional land grants.
Establishment and consolidation Both the Liberty of St. Cuthbert's Land and the Earldom of Bamburgh remained virtually independent of the Kingdom of England. With the possible exception of the Wapentake of Sadberge, the area north of the Tees lay outside of the West Saxon administrative system of shires and hundreds / wapentakes. Moreover, the lands north of the Tees remained unrecorded by the
Domesday Book and were not subject to geld or taxation. When William the Conqueror became the king of England in 1066, he quickly realised the need to control Northumbria to protect his kingdom from Scottish invasion. In 1075, shortly after the
Norman conquest,
William the Conqueror allowed Bishop
Walcher to purchase the earldom of Northumbria after its previous holder,
Waltheof, rebelled against the king. This may have marked the beginning of the bishops' temporal authority, with the
Bishop of Durham essentially inheriting the powers of the earl. Alternatively,
David D. Hall notes that the Patrimony of St. Cuthbert between the Tyne and Tees was likely immune from comital and regal action by the tenth century, with comital lands between the Tyne and Tees administered as the separate
wapentake of Sadberge. Instead, Hall posits that the Bishop's temporal powers developed by the early 12th century due to the emerging supremacy of the Bishop within the context of the Liberty's internal politics. However the bishops disputed the authority of the sheriff of Northumberland and his officials, despite the second sheriff for example being the reputed slayer of
Malcolm Canmore, King of Scots. The crown regarded Durham as falling within Northumberland until the late thirteenth century. Disputes with the officials of Northumberland were not resolved until 1293, when Bishop
Antony Bek and his
steward failed to attend a summons by the
justices of Northumberland, and the case eventually reached
Parliament. There, Bek argued that "from time immemorial it had been widely known that the sheriff of Northumberland was not sheriff of Durham nor entered within that liberty as
sheriff", and that Durham was independent of any other county. These arguments appear to have been accepted, as by the 14th century Durham was considered a County Palatine which received royal mandates direct. The jurisdiction of the bishops was also expanded during this period when the
wapentake of Sadberge was purchased by bishop
Hugh de Puiset in 1189. It was gradually incorporated into Durham, but retained separate
assizes until 1586.
Decline and abolition of
Cuthbert Tunstall, bishop 1530–51 and 1554–59, on
Durham Castle. They combine the arms of the diocese (left) with Tunstall's personal arms (right). Above the shield is a
mitre encircled by a
coronet, symbolising the bishops' spiritual and
temporal power. The later history of the palatinate is characterised by the Crown and parliament slowly diminishing the powers of the bishops and incorporating the county into the regular system of local government in England. This process began in 1536, when the Act of Resumption deprived the bishop of the power to pardon offences or to appoint judicial officers and mandated that the county's legal system would in future be run in the name of the king, rather than the bishop. In 1596, under
Elizabeth I, restrictions were placed on the palatinate's court of chancery. During the nineteenth century several other Acts of Parliament were passed which affected the governance of Durham. The
Durham (County Palatine) Act 1836 effectively abolished the palatine by transferring the bishop's remaining palatine rights to the Crown. Doubts about the construction of this Act led to the enactment of the
Durham County Palatine Act 1858. Durham was included in the standardisation of English and Welsh local government enacted by the
Local Government Act 1888, which created Durham County Council. Durham maintained its own judicial identity until the
Courts Act 1971 abolished its separate court of chancery. ==Administration==