The carol's music was added to Croo's manuscript at a later date by Thomas Mawdyke, his additions being dated 13 May 1591. Mawdyke wrote out the music in three-part harmony, though whether he was responsible for its composition is debatable, and the music's style could be indicative of an earlier date. The three (alto, tenor and baritone) vocal parts confirm that, as was usual with mystery plays, the parts of the "mothers" singing the carol were invariably played by men. Mawdyke, who may be identifiable with a tailor of that name living in the St Michael's parish of Coventry in the late 16th century, is thought to have made his additions as part of an unsuccessful attempt to revive the play cycle in the summer of 1591, though in the end the city authorities chose not to support the revival. The surviving pageants were revived in the Cathedral from 1951 onwards. A four-part setting of the tune by
Walford Davies is shown below: \new ChoirStaff | 2 4 | 2 4 | 2. | 4 | 2 2. ~ 2 4 | 2 4 | 2 4 | 2 > \oneVoice 2. | 4 | 2 | 2. \bar "|." } } \new Staff { \time 3/4 \key g \minor \clef bass 4 | 2 4 | 2 4 | 2. | 4 | 2 | 2. ~ 2 4 | 2 4 | 2 4 | ( ) | 2. | 4 | > \oneVoice 2. \bar "|." } >>
"Appalachian" variant A variant of the carol was supposedly collected by folklorist
John Jacob Niles in
Gatlinburg, Tennessee, in June 1934 (from an "old lady with a gray hat", who according to Niles's notes insisted on remaining anonymous). Niles surmised that the carol had been transplanted from England via the
shape note singing tradition, although this version of the carol has not been found elsewhere and there is reason to believe that Niles, a prolific composer, actually wrote it himself.
Joel Cohen uncovered an early shape note choral song from the 18th century which also includes some of the lyrics to the Coventry Carol and has a tune at least marginally resembling Niles' variant. For this reason, Cohen argued that the Appalachian variant was likely to be authentic and that Crump et al. had been too quick to assume chicanery on Niles' part due to his proclivity for editing some of his collected material. Although the tune is quite different from that of the "Coventry Carol", the text is largely similar except for the addition of an extra verse (described by
Poston as "regrettable"): A number of subsequent recorded versions have incorporated the fifth verse. ==See also==