Controversies The film was controversial, as was the book, because of its vivid depictions of graphic sexual acts instigated by violence. At the Cannes Film Festival, a screening provoked boos and angry bolts by upset viewers. In a 2020 interview, Cronenberg stated that he believed
Francis Ford Coppola, the jury president at the 1996 Cannes Film Festival, was so vehemently opposed to
Crash that other jury members in favor of the film banded together to present Cronenberg with a rare
Special Jury Prize. So great was Coppola's distaste for the film that, according to Cronenberg, Coppola refused to personally present the award to the director.
Clive Barker stated that the importance of family values and morality during the
1997 general election fuelled the controversy due to local authorities in Cardiff, Kirklees, North Lanarkshire, Walsall and Westminster banning the film. A theater manager in
Oslo, Norway, banned the film at her location. She denied it was related to a traffic accident that left her husband paralysed. The film eventually received a U.S. release in Spring 1997. AMC Entertainment Inc., the second-largest U.S. theater chain at the time, said it was posting security guards outside about 30 screens showing the movie to ensure minors did not get inside. At AMC's Century City location in Los Angeles, two security guards were present, one inside the auditorium and one outside. The film was still banned by
Westminster Council, meaning it could not be shown in any cinema in the
West End, even though they had earlier given special permission for the film's premiere, and it was easily seen in nearby Camden. An academic study of the controversy and audience responses to it, written by Martin Barker, Jane Arthurs and Ramaswami Harindranath, was published by
Wallflower Press in 2001, entitled
The Crash Controversy: Censorship Campaigns and Film Reception.
Critical reception On review aggregator
Rotten Tomatoes, the film has an approval rating of based on reviews, with an average score of . The consensus reads: "Despite the surprisingly distant, clinical direction, ''Crash's'' explicit premise and sex is classic Cronenberg territory." On
Metacritic, the film's score is listed as 53 out of 100, as determined by 23 critics, indicating "mixed or average reviews". In his contemporary review,
Roger Ebert gave the film 3.5 out of 4 stars, writing:
Crash is about characters entranced by a sexual fetish that, in fact, no one has. Cronenberg has made a movie that is pornographic in form, but not in result ... [
Crash is] like a porno movie made by a computer: It downloads gigabytes of information about sex, it discovers our love affair with cars, and it combines them in a mistaken algorithm. The result is challenging, courageous and original—a dissection of the mechanics of pornography. I admired it, although I cannot say I "liked" it.
J. Hoberman praised the film highly, noting the melancholy overtones and unconventional
dry humor that includes cars mimicking human sexual activity or vice versa (for instance, "a close-up of an automatic car window slowly rising, the running-gag equation of
tailgating and
rear-entry intercourse").
BBC film critic
Mark Kermode has described
Crash as "pretty much perfect" and praised Howard Shore's score, while admitting that it's a "hard film to like" and describing the cast's performances as "glacial". In 2000, a poll done by
The Village Voice of film critics listed
Crash as the 35th Best Film of the 1990s. A similar poll done by
Cahiers du cinéma placed it eighth. In 2005 the staff of
Total Film listed it at No. 21 on their list of the all-time greatest films.
Slant Magazine selected it as one of their "100 Essential Films". In 2002,
Parveen Adams, an academic who specializes in art/film/performance and psychoanalysis, argued that the flat texture of the film, achieved through various cinematic devices, prevent the viewer from identifying with the characters in the way one might with a more mainstream film. Instead of vicariously enjoying the sex and injury, the viewer finds himself a disimpassioned voyeur. Adams additionally noted that the scars borne by the characters are old and bloodless—in other words, the wounds lack vitality. The wound is "not traumatizing" but, rather, "a condition of our psychical and social life". In a 1996 interview with the
Vancouver Sun, Cronenberg said Italian film director
Bernardo Bertolucci told him "the film was a religious masterpiece." Of the adaptation, author J. G. Ballard reportedly said, "The movie is actually better than the book. It goes further than the book, and is much more powerful and dynamic. It's terrific." He promoted Cronenberg's work in his native country.
Accolades The film was nominated for the
Palme d'Or at the Cannes Film Festival. In the end, it won the
Special Jury Prize. Cannes jury president
Francis Ford Coppola noted that "certain [jury] members did abstain very passionately" from endorsing Cronenberg's film, but added that it was important to give
Crash an award, "even though in mining some truth of the human condition it offended [certain viewers]". However, other accounts have suggested it was Coppola himself who did not like the film, with producer Jeremy Thomas later saying, "It touched a nerve with him." In a 2020 interview for the film's 4K restoration, Cronenberg said Coppola was the main dissent on the support for the film on the Cannes jury, adding that "he wouldn't hand me the award" and got someone else to do it. The film received six
Genie Awards from the
Academy of Canadian Cinema and Television, including awards for Cronenberg as director and screenwriter; the film was also nominated in two further categories, including Best Picture. At the
1997 Stinkers Bad Movie Awards, the film was filed under the Founders Award, which lamented the year's biggest studio disgraces, and stated, "How Oscar winner Holly Hunter and the usually reliable James Spader and Rosanna Arquette got suckered into this mess is a mystery." The film was nominated for The Motion Picture Sound Editors Association's
Golden Reel Award for Best Sound Editing for a Foreign Feature. It also won the 1996
Cahiers du Cinéma Award for Best Film and was number eight on their list of Best Films of the 1990s. In 2019 it topped the
British Film Institute's list of the 90 best films of the 1990s. == See also ==