In
England and Wales, the act allows anybody to ask the Attorney General's Office for a sentence they consider unduly lenient to be reviewed; the Office can review sentences given by the Crown Court in England and Wales if requested to. The
Attorney General can then, within 28 days of the sentence, decide to refer sentences for certain offences to the
Court of Appeal if they consider that the sentence might be unduly lenient. The Court of Appeal will only find a sentence to be lenient, and increase it, if it falls outside the range of sentences which the trial judge could reasonably consider appropriate considering all the relevant information available at the time. This is sometimes called the 'unduly lenient sentence scheme'. This provision entered into force in 1989, and was first applied in July of that year. The controversially low sentences given to the rapists of
Jill Saward were one impetus for the scheme, The scheme has been criticised on the grounds of having become "too politicised", and that "too many cases [are being] referred, in some instances on most unusual grounds". The included offences are those which are
indictable and some
either-way offences, which are specified by the
secretary of state; the list of applicable either-way offences has been expanded since 1994. The number of requests made to the Attorney General increased from fewer than 300 in 2001 to 1,006 in 2018, which as of 2021 was the highest number of requests made. However, the number of cases referred by the Attorney General to the Court of Appeal remained within a roughly similar range during that period. The fraction of sentences referred that were found to be unduly lenient also remained roughly between 60% and 90%. == Section 134 – Torture ==