Historians have argued that the Croix-de-Feu were a distinctly-French variant of the European
fascist movement. If the uniformed rightist "
Leagues" of the 1930s did not develop into classical Fascism, it was because they represented a shading from conservative right-wing nationalism to extremist fascism, in membership and ideology, distinctive to French inter-war society. Most contemporary
French historians (
René Rémond,
Pierre Milza and François Sirinelli in particular) do not classify the 1930s "leagues" as a native "French Fascism", particularly the Croix-de-Feu. The organisation is described by Rémond as completely secretive about its aims with an ideology kept "as vague as possible." Rémond, the most famous and influential of these postwar historians, distinguishes "Reaction" and the far right from "revolutionary"
fascism as an import into France which had few takers. In the 1968 third edition of "
La droite en France", his major work he defines fascism in Europe as a revolt of the
declassés, a movement of those on half-pay, civilian and military. Everywhere it came to power through social upheavals.... Although with a handful of fascists [in 1930s France], there was a minority of reactionaries and a great majority of conservatives.Amongst these he places much smaller groups like the
Faisceau, a tiny minority compared with the Croix-de-Feu, whose membership peaked at over a million. The Israeli historian
Zeev Sternhell, on the other hand, has argued for the existence of a native French fascism and for groups like the
Cercle Proudhon of the mid-to-late 1910s being among the more important ideological breeding grounds of the movement. He, however, does not include the Croix de Feu in that category: The 'centrist' right always had its own shock troops that served its own purposes, and took good care that they did not become confused with the fascists. Sternhell, interested in fascism as an "anti-material revision of Marxism" or an anti-capitalist, cultish,
corporatist extreme nationalism, points out that groups like the
Jeunesses Patriotes, the revived
Ligue des Patriotes and the Croix de Feu were derided by French fascists at the time. Fascist leaders in France saw themselves as destroyers of the old order, above politics, and rejecting the corruption of capitalism. To them the Leagues were a bulwark of this corrupt regime.
Robert Brasillach called them "old cuckolds of the right, these eternal deceived husbands of politics.." and claimed that "the enemies of national restoration are not only on the left but first and foremost on the right.l". The American journalist
John Gunther in 1940 described La Rocque as a "French Fascist No. 1, the chief potential French
March-on-Romer" but added that he was "a rather pallid Fascist", did not attempt to seize power during the 6 February riots and peacefully complied with the government's ban of the Croix de Feu. Other scholars, such as
Robert Soucy and
William D. Irvine, argue that the La Rocque and the Croix de Feu were in fact fascist and a particularly "French" fascism. La Rocque, however, if tempted by a paramilitary aesthetic and initially advocating
collaboration with the Germans during the Second World War, finally came out against the more radical supporters of
Nazi Germany. ==See also==