Radical and moderate Islam Pipes has long expressed alarm about what he believes to be the dangers of "radical" or "
militant Islam" to the Western world. In 1985, he wrote in
Middle East Insight that "[t]he scope of the radical fundamentalist's ambition poses novel problems; and the intensity of his onslaught against the United States makes solutions urgent." In the fall 1995 issue of
National Interest, he wrote: "Unnoticed by most Westerners, war has been unilaterally declared on Europe and the United States." Pipes wrote in 2007, "It's a mistake to blame Islam, a religion 14 centuries old, for the evil that should be ascribed to militant Islam, a totalitarian ideology less than a century old. Militant Islam is the problem, but moderate Islam is the solution." Pipes described moderate Muslims as "a very small movement" in comparison to "the Islamist onslaught" and said that the U.S. government "should give priority to locating, meeting with, funding, forwarding, empowering, and celebrating" them. Pipes has praised
Mustafa Kemal Atatürk in Turkey and the Sudanese thinker
Mahmoud Mohamed Taha. In a September 2008 interview by
Peter Robinson, Pipes stated that Muslims can be divided into three categories: "traditional Islam", which he sees as pragmatic and non-violent, "Islamism", which he sees as dangerous and militant, and "moderate Islam", which he sees as underground and not yet codified into a popular movement. He elaborated that he did not have the "theological background" to determine what group follows the
Koran the closest and is truest to its intent.
Muslims in Europe In 1990, Pipes wrote in
National Review that Western European societies were "unprepared for the massive immigration of brown-skinned peoples cooking strange foods and maintaining different standards of hygiene ... Muslim immigrants bring with them a chauvinism that augurs badly for their integration into the mainstream of the European societies." At that time, he believed Muslim immigrants would "probably not change the face of European life" and might "even bring much of value, including new energy, to their host societies". New York University academic Arun Kundnani cited the article as "Islamophobic". Pipes later said "my goal in it was to characterize the thinking of Western Europeans, not give my own views. In retrospect, I should either have put the words 'brown-skinned peoples' and 'strange foods' in quotation marks or made it clearer that I was explaining European attitudes rather than my own." In 2006, Daniel Pipes said that certain neighborhoods in
France were "no-go zones" and "that the French state no longer has full control over its territory." In 2013, Pipes traveled to several of these neighborhoods and admitted he was mistaken. In 2015 he sent an email to
Bloomberg saying that there are "no European countries with no-go zones." In response to the
Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy, Pipes wrote that the "key issue at stake" was whether the "West [would] stand up for its customs and mores, including freedom of speech" and the "right to insult and blasphemy". He supported
Robert Spencer's call to "stand resolutely with Denmark." He lauded Norway, Germany and France for their stance on the cartoons and freedom of speech, but criticized Poland, Britain, New Zealand and the United States for giving statements he interpreted as "wrongly apologizing." Through his Middle East Forum, Pipes fund-raised for the far-right Dutch politician
Geert Wilders during his
trial, according to
NRC Handelsblad. Pipes has praised Wilders as "the unrivaled leader of those Europeans who wish to retain their historic [European] identity" and called him "the most important politician in Europe." At the same time, he found Wilders' political program "bizarre" and not to be taken too seriously while criticizing Wilders' understanding of Islam as "superficial" for being against all of Islam and not just its extreme variant.
Muslims in the United States In October 2001, Pipes said before a convention of the
American Jewish Congress: "I worry very much, from the Jewish point of view, that the presence, and increased stature, and affluence, and enfranchisement of American Muslims, because they are so much led by an Islamist leadership, that this will present true dangers to American Jews."
The New York Times reported that American Muslims were "enraged" by Pipes' arguments that Muslims in government and military positions be given special attention as security risks and his opining that mosques are "breeding grounds for militants." In a 2004 article in
The New York Sun, Pipes endorsed a defense of the
internment of Japanese Americans during World War II, and linked the
Japanese-American wartime situation to that of
Muslim Americans today. Pipes has criticized the
Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), which he says is an "
apologist" for
Hezbollah and
Hamas, and has a "roster of employees and board members connected to terrorism". CAIR, in turn, has said that "Pipes' writings are full of distortions and innuendo."
The New York Times cited Pipes as helping to lead the charge against
Debbie Almontaser, a woman with a "longstanding reputation as a Muslim moderate" whom Pipes viewed as a representative of a pernicious new movement of "lawful Islamists." Almontaser resigned under pressure as principal of
Khalil Gibran International Academy, an Arabic-language high school in New York City named after the Christian Arab-American poet. Pipes initially described the school as a "
madrassa", which means school in Arabic but, in the West, carries the implication of Islamist teaching, though he later admitted that his use of the term had been "a bit of a stretch". However, he explicitly rejected the label in April 2009 due to differences with the neoconservative positions on democracy and Iraq, now considering himself a "plain
conservative".
Donald Trump and the Republican Party In 2016, Pipes resigned from the
Republican Party after it endorsed
Donald Trump as its 2016 presidential candidate. Yet he announced in a
Boston Globe article of October 20, 2020, that he was voting for Trump in that year's
presidential election, on the grounds that, "Rather than the person, I advise a focus on a party’s overall outlook... I urge fellow voters to dwell on the strikingly different platforms of the two major parties...and support whichever one better suits their own views; and to do so regardless of the candidates' many failings."
Arab–Israeli conflict Pipes supports
Israel in the
Arab–Israeli conflict and is an opponent of a
Palestinian state. He wrote in
Commentary in April 1990 that "there can be either an Israel or a Palestine, but not both ... to those who ask why the Palestinians must be deprived of a state, the answer is simple: grant them one and you set in motion a chain of events that will lead either to its extinction or the extinction of Israel." Pipes has proposed a
three-state solution to the conflict, in which Gaza would be given to Egypt and the West Bank to Jordan. In September 2008, he said, "Palestinians do not accept the existence of a Jewish state. Until that change, I don't see any point in having any kind of negotiations whatsoever." He also described the Israeli public as focused on a mistaken policy that he considers to be "
appeasement". He has also defended the controversial
Canary Mission, stating "collecting information on students has particular value because it signals them that attacking Israel is serious business, not some inconsequential game, and that their actions can damage both Israel and their future careers".
Iran Pipes' opposition to Iran is long-standing. In 1980, Pipes wrote that "Iran made the transition to a post-oil economy. It is the only major oil exporter to abandon the heady billions and return to live by its own means." Pipes was critical of the
Reagan administration for its role in the
Iran–Contra affair, writing that "American actions also helped to legitimize other kinds of help for, and capitulation to, the Ayatollah." In 2010, Pipes advocated that U.S. President
Barack Obama "give orders for the U.S. military to destroy Iran's nuclear-weapon capacity. ... The time to act is now." He argued that "circumstances are propitious" for the U.S. to initiate a bombing of Iran, and that "no one other than the Iranian rulers and their agents denies that the regime is rushing headlong to build a large nuclear arsenal." He further stated that a unilateral U.S. bombing of Iran "would require few 'boots on the ground' and entail relatively few casualties, making an attack more politically palatable." Previously listed as a terrorist group by the U.S. and the
European Union, Pipes had long advocated a change in that listing. Pipes had described this listing as a "sop to the mullahs". He writes, "the MEK poses no danger to Americans or Europeans, and has not for decades. It does pose a danger to the malign, bellicose theocratic regime in Tehran."
Media Matters for America responded by exposing Pipes reliance on "disputed
Los Angeles Times article", whose key claims were debunked by
Kim Barker in the
Chicago Tribune on 25 March.
Ben Smith, in an article on
Politico, criticized Pipes for what he said were
false or misleading statements about Barack Obama's religion, stating that they amounted to a "template for a faux-legitimate assault on Obama's religion" and that Pipes' work "is pretty stunning in the twists of its logic". ==Reception==