Almost from the outset, the phrase
Darmstadt School was used as a belittling term by commentators like
Kurt Honolka (a 1962 article is quoted in ) to describe any music written in an uncompromising style, despite the presence of many composers and schools which forbid serialism and modernism. During the late 1950s and early 1960s the courses were charged with a perceived lack of interest on the part of some of its zealot followers in any music not matching the uncompromisingly modern views of Pierre Boulez—the "party subservience" of the "clique orthodoxy" of a "sect", in the words of Dr. Kurt Honolka, written in 1962 in an effort to "make the public believe that the most advanced music of the day was no more than a fancy cooked up by a bunch of aberrant conspirators conniving at war against music proper". This led to the use of the phrase 'Darmstadt School' (coined originally in 1957 by Luigi Nono to describe the
serial music being written at that time by himself and composers such as Boulez, Maderna, Stockhausen, Berio, and
Pousseur) as a pejorative term, implying a "mathematical," rule-based music. Composer
Hans Werner Henze, whose music was regularly performed at Darmstadt in the 1950s, reacted against the Darmstadt School
ideologies, particularly the way in which (according to him) young composers were forced either to write in total
dodecaphony or be ridiculed or ignored. In his collected writings, Henze recalls student composers rewriting their works on the train to Darmstadt in order to comply with Boulez's expectations. One of the leading figures of the Darmstadt School itself, Franco Evangelisti, was also outspoken in his criticism of the
dogmatic "orthodoxy" of certain zealot
disciples, labelling them the "Dodecaphonic police". A self-declared member of the school,
Konrad Boehmer states: ==References==