The documentary has received mixed reviews, both for its use of economics and its political intention as a film, both by Greek and international media. The documentary depicted scenes where Argentinian and Ecuadorian politicians had to evacuate the besieged parliaments by means of a
helicopter. Iconic images and references to helicopters were adopted by the
Aganaktismenoi movement who surrounded the
Greek Parliament in 2011. Critics of the film make four main points: ; Accusation of propaganda Major Greek newspapers such as
To Vima and
Kathimerini have criticized the documentary as a work of political propaganda.
To Vima argues that Greece's and
Ecuador's economies have little in common, as Ecuador is a major oil producer for its size and population, contrary to Greece.
In universities Professor of Economics at the
University of Athens wrote a letter to the producers of
Debtocracy explaining the reasons for which he refused to be included in the documentary production team, and said among other things that he does not believe that Greece and Argentina have anything in common and that a default would not be an easy solution.
Response to criticisms When asked about the one-sidedness of the film by the Greek newspaper
Eleftherotypia, the producers replied that they had made it clear from the start who was funding the project, that they used abstracts from documentaries produced by reporters of the
BBC, and that those people that speak out against
Debtocracy are the same people that find the television news broadcasts to be objective and credible. ==See also==