According to mainstream
Muslim theologians, God is described as '''' ('ancient'), having no first, without beginning or end; absolute, not limited by time or place or circumstance, nor is subject to any decree so as to be determined by any precise limits or set times, but is the First and the Last. He is not a formed body, nor a
substance circumscribed with limits or determined by measure; neither does he resemble bodies as they are capable of being measured or divided. Neither do substances exist in him; neither is he an accident, nor do accidents exist in him. Neither is he like to anything that exists, nor is anything like to him; nor is he determinate in quantity, nor comprehended by bounds, nor circumscribed by differences of situation, nor contained in the heavens, and transcends spatial and temporal bounds, and remains beyond the bounds of human comprehension and perceptions.
Sunnis Atharis For
Atharis the names and attributes of God are to be understood with the formula of
bila kayfa (lit. "without how", i.e., "without modality", "without further enquiry" or "without further specifying their manner or modality"), which is to unquestioningly accept the Divine attributes of God without
ta'wil (allegorical interpretation), or
ta'til (lit. "suspension", i.e., "divesting God of His attributes"), or
tashbih (
anthropomorphism,
immanence or comparison, which is to believe that God resembles his creations, or attributing the attributes of human beings to God). Any anthropomorphic expressions of these names and attributes is negated using the admission that their meanings can never be known. The meaning is left to the knowledge of God himself, and they simply say that the meaning is as befits his majesty and perfection. This method of
tafwid is that of
Ahmad ibn Hanbal (eponymous founder of Atharism),
al-Ash'ari,
Ibn Qudama, and
Ibn Kathir. Usually Atharis are vehemently opposed to engaging in ta'wil (allegorical interpretations) and reject
batin (inner meaning) or hidden/esoteric (
Sufi) interpretations of the Qur'an and God's divine attributes. In maintaining that one is not permitted to interpret the meaning of the Qur'anic verses or the Prophetic traditions that mention various attributes of God,
Ibn Qudama (d. 620/1223) in his work '''' ("The Luminance of Creed") is endorsing the principle of bila kayfa ('without [asking or knowing] how') in
Islamic theology. According to this principle, one has to accept the sacred text as it is, indissolubly linked with
tanzih (God's incomparability and transcendence), without trying to interpret its meaning. In other words, one must accept the sacred texts that refer to God without positively ascribing corporeal features to him.
Ibn al-Jawzi (d. 597/1201) took the question of people associating anthropomorphism with
Hanbalism so seriously that he wrote a book, ''
Daf' Shubah al-Tashbih bi-Akaff al-Tanzih'' ("Rebuttal of the Insinuations of Anthropomorphism at the Hands of Divine Transcendence"), with the aim of refuting anthropomorphic views and arguing that Ahmad ibn Hanbal was not an anthropomorphist. According to him, such words whose meanings could give the impression that God resembles his creations should not be understood literally, such as God's face, hands, eyes, and the like. Another book was written by the Shafi'i scholar, (d. 829/1426), titled '''' ("Rebuttal of the Insinuations of him who makes Anthropomorphisms and Rebels, and Ascribes that to the Noble Master Imam Ahmad"), defending Ahmad ibn Hanbal against the innovated beliefs later ascribed to him by Ibn Taymiyya and those who claimed to follow his school.
Ibn Kathir (d. 774/1373) appears to offer a definition similar to that of
al-Ash'ari (d. 324/936) when he discusses
tafwid in his exegesis of the Qur'anic verse (7:54) pertaining to God's istiwa'. He states: Here Ibn Kathir is diverting the meaning of the text from its apparent meaning, and implicitly affirming that one valid definition of the term zahir is its literal linguistic meaning, which is anthropomorphic. Nevertheless, some modern followers of
Ibn Taymiyya claim that
bi lā takyīf would only mean tafwid of modality but not of meaning (ma'na), but
Ash'aris/
Maturidis assert that modality (kayfiyya) is a part of meaning, and without detailing which aspect of meaning remains after de-anthropomorphizing a term, one ends up with tafwid. In addition to that the imams of the salaf (the righteous early generations of Muslims) used to say bila kayf (without how or modality at all). On the other hand, both Ibn Taymiyya (d. 728/1328) and his student
Ibn al-Qayyim (d. 751/1350) argued that the anthropomorphic references to God, such as God's hands or face, are to be understood literally and affirmatively according to their apparent meanings. In their footsteps and following them come the
Salafi groups of modern times such as the followers of
Muhammad ibn 'Abd al-Wahhab (d. 1201/1787) who closely follow Ibn Taymiyya's approach regarding the Divine names and attributes. The doctrine of the
Salaf that Ibn Taymiyya derives from his traditionalist sources consists in describing God as he describes himself and as his messenger describes him, neither stripping the attributes away (ta'til) in the fashion of
kalam (rational or speculative theology), nor likening (tamthil) them to the attributes of creatures because there is nothing like God [Q. 42:11]. For Ibn Taymiyya, this means that the Salaf knew the meanings of the Divine attributes, and they do not merely delegate them to God. However, certain formulaic statements attributed to them do not appear to support his position unequivocally. Ibn Taymiyya notes that al-Awza'i (d. 157/774),
Sufyan al-Thawri (d. 161/778), and others said concerning the attributes, "Let them pass by as they came", and "Let them pass by as they came, without how". He explains that letting the attributes pass by (imrār) means leaving them intact and not stripping away their meanings, while affirming the attributes "without how" or "without modality" (bi-lā kayf) means not assimilating them to the attributes of creatures. With this, Ibn Taymiyya holds affirmation of the meanings of God's attributes together with denial of their likeness to creatures in a double perspective by drawing a distinction between the known meanings of the attributes and their inscrutable modalities. In this regard it has been mentioned in some narrations that are ascribed to Ahmad ibn Hanbal (d. 241/855), it has been reported that he said: "Whatever comes to your mind (i.e., regarding God and His nature), God is different than that." Or in the words: "God is completely different from whatever comes to your mind concerning Him." According to
al-Shahrastani (d. 548/1154) in his
al-Milal wa al-Nihal ("Religious Sects and Divisions"), Ahmad ibn Hanbal and
Dawud al-Zahiri (d. 270/884) and a group of imams of the Salaf, they followed the way of the early traditionalists (
ashab al-hadith), such as
Malik ibn Anas (d. 179/795). They took a safe path, saying "We believe in whatever is reported from the Book and the Sunna, and we do not try to interpret it, knowing for certain that God does not resemble any created things, and that all the images we form of Him are created by Him and formed by Him". They avoided
anthropomorphism (tashbih) to such an extent that they said that if a man moved his hand while reading the Qur'anic verse that speaks of God's creating
Adam using his own "hands" 38:75 Q.; or if he pointed with his two fingers while reporting the
hadith: "The heart of the believer is between the two fingers of
al-Rahman (the Most Compassionate)", his hand must be cut off and the two fingers torn out. These early scholars were often called the People of Tradition (
Ahl al-Hadith), or Salaf such as
Abu Hanifa, Malik,
al-Shafi'i and Ahmad ibn Hanbal. They left the verses of the Qur'an in question as well as the related hadiths simply as they were, accepting the poetical statements just as they occurred, without applying much reason either to criticize or expand upon them. Their position was that these ambiguous verses must be understood in light of the Qur'anic dictum that, "There is nothing whatever like Him" [Q. 42:11] hence negating all possibilities of anthropomorphism. At the same time, they used and maintained the same phrases or terminology implied by the Qur'an with regards to God such as God's face without looking further into their meaning or exegesis. And this is what is being referred to by use of their phrase
bila kayfa wa la tashbih, meaning without inquiring how and without anthropomorphism or comparison.
Ibn Hazm (d. 456/1064) in his book '''' ("The Distinction Concerning Religions, Heresies, and Sects") said also that Ahmad ibn Hanbal figuratively interpreted ‘And your Lord comes...’ [Q. 89:22], but as meaning "And your Lord's command/decree has come." Among the most significant Athari theological works are: • ''Naqd ‘Uthman ibn Sa’id Ad-Darimi 'ala Al-Marisi al Jahmi al 'aneed fi ma iftara 'ala Allah fit tawheed'' by
Uthman ibn Sa'id al-Darimi (d. 280/815). •
Kitaab at-Tawheed by
Ibn Khuzayma (d. 311/924). • ''Kitaab al-'Uluww al-'Aliyy al-Ghafaar
and Kitaab al-'Arsh'' by
Al-Dhahabi (d. 748/1348). • ''Lawami' al-Anwar al-Bahiyya wa Sawati' al-Asrar al-Athariyya'' by
Al-Saffarini (d. 1188/1774). •
Bahjat al-Nazirin wa Ayat al-Mustadillin (The Delight of Onlookers and the Signs for Investigators) by
Mar'i al-Karmi (d. 1033/1624), on
cosmology and the affairs of the Last Judgment and the Afterlife.
Ash'aris and Maturidis ''" (the Guiding Creed) by
Ibn Tumart (d. 524/1130) — the student of
al-Ghazali (d. 505/ 1111) and the founder of the
Almohad dynasty — praised and approved by
Fakhr al-Din Ibn 'Asakir (d. 620/1223), located at al-Salah Islamic secondary school in
Baalbek, Lebanon.
Ash'aris and
Maturidis are in agreement that God's attributes are
eternal and are to be held to be metaphorically. References to
anthropomorphic attributes can probably not be understood correctly by humans. Although God's existence is considered to be possibly known by reason, human mind can not fully understand God's attributes. Ash'ari and Maturidi scholars have two positions regarding the
Mutashabihat texts (ambiguous passages in the Qur'an and Hadith) related to God's attributes:
Tafwid (affirming the attributes of God, but consigning/entrusting both their meaning and modality to God, or in other words, leaving the interpretation of anthropomorphic expressions to God) and
Ta'wil (metaphorical interpretation). The two positions disregard the literal meaning of the texts due to the definitive evidences denoting the transcendence of God above the attributes of his created beings as per his words: and For example, when believers in
paradise see God, they do not see God in the way humans are able to see on Earth.
Abu Mansur al-Baghdadi (d. 429/1037) in his
al-Farq bayn al-Firaq (The Difference between the Sects) reports that
'Ali ibn Abi Talib, the fourth Caliph, said: "
Allah created the Throne as an indication of His power, not for taking it as a place for Himself." Accordingly, expressions such as ''God's istiwa' on the Throne'' means by ta'wil or figurative interpretation, exercise of his power upon the universe, this denotes his assumption of authority of his created world, the throne being a symbol of authority and dominion, while in tafwid, they just say: ''Allahu A'lam'' (God knows best), together with their understanding of
Tanzih (God's incomparability and transcendence), which means that his istiwa' upon the throne, in the manner which he himself has described, and in that same sense which he himself means, which is far removed from any notion of contact, or resting upon, or local situation. It is impermissible to say that he established himself with a contact or a meeting with it. Because God is not subject to change, substitution, nor limits, whether before or after the creation of the throne. Ash'aris and Maturidis are in general agreement that God is free from all imperfections and flaws. He has Divine attributes. Divine attributes are characteristics or qualities that God alone possesses. The Divine attributes are classified into: negative and positive. By the "Negative Attribute" they mean the negation of the negative, i.e. negation of imperfection. Among the most important are the following: • The negative divine attributes are of two kinds; firstly those which are meant to deny all imperfections in God's Being, e.g., that he has no equal and no rival, no parents and no children; secondly those which indicate his beyondness, e.g., that he is not body or physical, is neither substance nor attribute, is not space or spatial, is not limited or finite, has neither dimensions nor relations, i.e., he is above the application of our categories of thought. • The positive divine attributes are such as life, knowledge, power, will, hearing, seeing, and speaking. The Ash'ari and Maturidi scholars emphasise that the
Qur'an expresses that God does not need any of his creation as he is perfect. He is immutable (does not change), self-subsisting and self-sufficient, without figure, form, colour or parts. His existence has neither beginning nor end. He is not a body composed of substances or elements. He is not an accident inherent in a body or dwelling in a place. He is unique, unlike anything in his creation. He is
ineffable, beyond human understanding, comprehension and therefore human description, as per his words: He is
omnitemporal in the way that he is
omnipresent, as per his words: He is everywhere by his knowledge and power, and nowhere, without being in a place, direction or location, because He existed eternally before all the creations (including time and space) and is clear from change. He is always in the present, yet transcends time. God is not within time; time is one of his creations and does not affect him, so for him there is no past, present and future. The Hanafi-
Maturidi scholar,
'Ali al-Qari (d. 1014/1606) in his
Sharh al-Fiqh al-Akbar states: "
Allah the Exalted is not in any place or space, nor is He subject to time, because both time and space are amongst His creations. He the Exalted was present in pre-existence and there was nothing of the creation with Him". At the same time, he is near to everything that has being; nay, he is nearer to men than their jugular veins (this is alluded to in the verse 50:16), and is witness to everything —though his nearness is not like the nearness of bodies, as neither is his essence like the essence of bodies. Neither does he exist in anything or does anything exist in him; but he is beyond space and time; for he is the creator of space and time, and was before space and time were created, and is now after the same manner as He always was (i.e., without place nor time). He is also distinct from the creatures in his attributes, neither is there anything besides himself in his essence, nor is his essence in any other besides him. He is too holy to be subject to change or any local motion; neither do any accidents dwell in him, nor any contingencies before him; but he abides with his glorious attributes, free from all danger of dissolution. As to the attribute of perfection, he wants no addition. As to being, he is known to exist by the apprehension of the understanding; and he is seen as he is by immediate intuition, which will be vouchsafed out of his mercy and grace to the believers in the paradise, completing their joy by the vision of his glorious presence. The possibility of seeing God in the afterlife became a pillar of the Ash'ari and the Maturidi schools.
Al-Ash'ari holds that God will be seen in the next world by sight.
Al-Maturidi also accepts the visibility of God, however his explanation is qualified: people will see God in way that it is incomprehensible to humans in this life and is not like the normal sight that we use to sense light and distance.
Al-Ghazali promised that people would enjoy the pleasure of looking on God's noble face. Ash'aris and Maturidis insisted on the reality of that vision even if they admitted their inability to fully explain how it will happen. According to them, God can be seen even if he cannot be perceived through vision. Al-Ghazali in his ''
al-Iqtisad fi al-I'tiqad'' (Moderation in Belief) explains the Ash'ari position that God will be seen in the afterlife despite the fact that he has no physical body, nor any location or direction.
Mu'tazilis and
Shi'is deny that God can be seen for the simple reason that visibility, as man understands it requires the object of vision to be in place and this is inconceivable in reference to God. Ash'aris and Maturidis agree with this proposition, but only if they are talking of vision here on Earth and within the physical laws applicable here. However, if it is going to happen somewhere else and under a different set of laws, visibility is possible, for whatever exists can be seen under proper conditions. Ash'aris and Maturidis
unanimously agree that it is only in the
Hereafter that God will be seen. Among the evidences that have been used by them in establishing the permissibility of seeing God are the following: Goodness (or
ihsan, husna) is to act in accordance with the wise commandments of God. Muhammad defined it as being a servant to God as though one saw him. The greatest good shall be for them (i.e., Paradise), and also "even more"; the delight of gazing upon the ineffable and blessed Countenance of God. It was narrated that
Suhayb said: During the lifetime of Muhammad some people asked: Muhammad said also in an
authentic hadith mentioned in
Sahih al-Bukhari,
Sahih Muslim,
Jami' al-Tirmidhi,
Sunan Abi Dawud, and
Sunan ibn Majah: "Certainly, you will see your Rubb (on the Day of Resurrection) as you see this (full) moon, and you will have no difficulty (or trouble) in seeing Him." In addition, the Qur'an also confirms in 83:15 that: Among the most significant Ash'ari-Maturidi theological works are: •
Kitab al-Tawhid by
Abu Mansur al-Maturidi (d. 333/944). • ''
Al-Insaf fima Yajib I'tiqaduh'' by
Abu Bakr al-Baqillani (d. 403/1013). •
A Guide to Conclusive Proofs for the Principles of Belief by
Abu al-Ma'ali al-Juwayni (d. 478/1085). •
The Moderation in Belief by
Abu Hamid al-Ghazali (d. 505/1111). •
Tabsirat al-Adilla by
Abu al-Mu'in al-Nasafi (d. 508/1114). •
Asas al-Taqdis by
Fakhr al-Din al-Razi (d. 606/1209). • The Commentaries on ''
Al-'Aqida al-Tahawiyya''.
Mu'tazilis The
Mu'tazilis reject the
anthropomorphic attributes of God because an eternal being "must be unique" and attributes would make God comparable. The descriptions of God in the
Quran are considered to be
allegories. Nevertheless, the Muʿtazilites thought God contains oneness (tawhid) and justice. Other characteristics like knowledge are not attributed to God; rather they describe his essence. Otherwise eternal attributes of God would give rise to a multiplicity entities existing eternal besides God. Among the most significant Mu'tazili theological works are: •
Sharh al-Usul al-Khamsa (Explaining the Five Principles) by
al-Qadi 'Abd al-Jabbar (d. 415/1025). •
Al-Minhaj fi Usul al-Din (The Curriculum/Method in the Fundamentals of Religion) by
al-Zamakhshari (d. 538/1144).
Jahmism The Jahmites were an early Islamic denomination who insisted on the absolute incomparability of God and favored
Natural theology. The founder
Jahm bin Safwan was a major opponent of the
Murjite and anthropomoprhist theologian
Muqatil ibn Sulayman. For the Jahmites, God is wholly other and imcomparable, removed from every conceptualization or description by humans. Jahmi derives his doctrine from his epistemology: since all conceptualization are derived from the created world, there is no way to envision God. The lack of attributes to God brought him the accusation of denial of God. However, because everything what happens in this world – including what is done by living beings – are God's actions, Jahmite's
concept of God is pervading everything. Still, God is not mixed with creation and the object of worship remains transcendent. Jahms did not deny that the attributes of God are real or a thing, but argues that God is not a thing. Furthermore, Jahm's
epistemology is
empiricistic not
rationalistic. The created world is, for the Jahmites, ultimately unreal, as only God can be considered real. This also sets them apart from the
Mu'tazilites. Due to God's absoluteness, Jahmites adhere to
predestination and reject the view that a person has free will and insist that actions are determined by God. The Jahmiyya believed this because they thought that human free will would entail a limitation on God's power, and so must be rejected. Since there is no essence and no self-existence in Jahmite's thought, except for God, the Jahmites also denied the eternity of paradise and hell.
Shi'is The
Shi'is agreed with the
Mu'tazilis and deny that God will be seen with the physical eyes either in this world or in the next.
Isma'ilis According to
Isma'ilism, God is absolutely transcendent and unknowable; beyond matter, energy, space, time, change, imaginings, intellect, positive as well as negative qualities. All attributes of God named in rituals, scriptures or prayers refers not to qualities God possesses, but to qualities emanated from God, thus these are the attributes God gave as the source of all qualities, but God does not consist on one of these qualities. One philosophical definition of the world Allah is " The Being Who concentrates in Himself all the attributes of perfection " or "the Person Who is the Essential Being, and Who encompasses all the attributes of perfection". In
Ismailism, assigning attributes to God as well as negating any attributes from God (
via negativa) both qualify as
anthropomorphism and are rejected, as God cannot be understood by either assigning attributes to him or taking attributes away from him. The 10th-century Ismaili philosopher
Abu Yaqub al-Sijistani suggested the method of double negation; for example: "God is not existent" followed by "God is not non-existent". This glorifies God from any understanding or human comprehension.
Twelvers The Twelver Shi'is believe that God has no shape, no physical hand, no physical leg, no physical body, no physical face. They believe God has no visible appearance. God does not change in time, nor does he occupy a physical place. Under no circumstances, the Shi'is argues, does God change. There is also no time frame regarding God. As support for their view, Shi'i scholars often point to the Qur'anic verse 6:103 which states: "Eyes comprehend Him not, but He comprehends all eyes. He is the All-Subtle (penetrating everything no matter how small), the All-Aware." Thus one fundamental difference between
Sunnis and Shi'is that the former believes that followers will "see" their Lord on the Day of Resurrection, while the latter holds that God cannot be seen because he is beyond space and time. Among the most significant Shi'i theological works are: •
Kitab al-Tawhid (Book of Monotheism) by
Ibn Babawayh – also known as al-Shaykh al-Saduq – (d. 381 H/991). • ''
Tajrid al-I'tiqad'' (Sublimation of Belief) by
Nasir al-Din al-Tusi (d. 672/1274).
Sufism The majority of
Sufis adhere to the same beliefs and practices of orthodox theology of
Sunni Islam, both the
Ash'ari and
Maturidi schools, the essential difference in theology being that Sufis believe ''Ma'iyyat Allah'' (God's presence, togetherness, companionship) – derived from the Qur'anic verse 4 in
Surat al-Hadid which states: – is not only by knowledge, comprehension and power, but also by nature and essence, which is God himself, being everywhere by presence.
Hulul and Ittihad According to
Ahmad ibn 'Ajiba (d. 1224/1809) in his
al-Bahr al-Madid:
Ahl al-Batin (people of the inner knowledge who follow the
esoteric interpretation, i.e., the Sufis) have a
consensus on that God is everywhere by presence and essence (in all places at once with his entire being despite his spacelessness), but without
Hulul (God's indwelling, fusion/infusion, incarnation in creation) and without
Ittihad (God's identification, unification, union with creation), unlike
Ahl al-Zahir (people of the outward observance; the uninitiated), who are unanimously agreed that God is
omnipresent only by knowledge and power. According to
Muhammad Metwalli al-Sha'rawi (d. 1419/1998) in his interpretation (better known as ) of the Qur'anic verses , which are mentioned in
Surat al-Waqi'ah: "
83. Why then (are you helpless) when it (i.e., the soul of a dying person at the moment of death) reaches the throat,
84. While you are looking on,
85. And We (i.e., God
and/or His angels) are nearer/closer to him (the dying human) than you are, but you do not see." Al-Sha'rawi stated that God's statement in verse 56:85 "but you do not see" proves clearly and unequivocally that ''Ma'iyyatullah'' (meaning 'companionship of God', literally: 'togetherness with God') is true/real with his essence (dhat), which is not like the essence of created beings, and his companionship is not only with knowledge, if so, then God wouldn't say "but you do not see". Since God in Islam is transcendental and sovereign but also immanent and omnipresent, the
Sufi view holds that in reality, only God exists. Thus everything in creation is reflecting an attribute of God's names. Yet these forms are not God themselves. The
Sufi Saint Ibn Arabi stated:
There is nothing but God. This statement was mistakenly equalized to
Pantheism by critics; however, Ibn Arabi always made a clear distinction between the creation and the creator. Since God is the
Absolute Reality, the created worlds and their inhabitants are merely illusions. They just exist because of God's command
Kun, but everything that would be, was already known by God. Both beliefs Hulul (incarnation) and Ittihad (unification) had been severely denounced by moderate Sunni Sufis, such as
'Abd al-Ghani al-Nabulsi (d. 1143/1731), which he described as
heresies. Among the most significant Sufi theological works are: • ''Al-Ta'aruf li-Madhhab Ahl al-Tasawwuf'' (Inquiry into the Tenets of the Sufis) by
Abu Bakr al-Kalabadhi (d. 385/995), recognised as an authoritative treatise on the mystical doctrines. •
Al-Risala al-Qushayriyya by
al-Qushayri (d. 465/1072). •
Futuh al-Ghayb (Revelations of the Unseen) by
'Abd al-Qadir al-Jilani (d. 561/1166). • ''Al-Burhan al-Mu'ayyad'' (The Advocated Proof) by
Ahmad al-Rifa'i (d. 578/1182). == See also ==