Politics In Switzerland, 26 different exemptions have been introduced since the introduction of VAT in 1995. Federal Councilor
Kaspar Villiger already complained about the ever-increasing number of exemptions. His successor, Swiss Finance Minister Federal Councilor
Hans-Rudolf Merz, went further and launched the idea of a simplified VAT in 2003. In the spirit of a "
flat tax" he proposed that in the future there should be no exceptions in Switzerland and that the current VAT rate of 2.5% on everyday goods, 3.7% on accommodation services and the 7.7% on all other services should be set at a uniform rate in the range of 5% to 6%. The Federal Department of Finance formulates the characteristics of an "ideal VAT" as follows: • It is still designed as a net all-phase tax with input tax deduction. • It only burdens final consumption and is levied according to the destination principle. • It has no exceptions. • It is levied at a uniform rate. Liberal advocates of a unified value-added tax argue that this would free companies from costly and cumbersome accrual and accounting problems. At the same time, the tax system would be simplified. In the political debate, however, this proposal seems to have little chance of being realized. Among other things, the standard rate of 5 to 6% would lead to an increase in the price of basic foodstuffs (currently taxed at 2.5%), which would primarily affect the poorer sections of the population. In mid-February 2006, the Federal Council decided that the Value Added Tax Act should undergo a total revision. As an interim solution, Art. 45a VAT Act was introduced as of 1 July 2006. This is intended to ensure that the administration no longer confronts VAT payers with unobjective additional claims merely for formal reasons. However, how this "pragmatism article" is to be implemented was still completely unknown. In mid-February 2007, the Federal Council published the details and sent them out for consultation: • The first "module" is described as the total revision of the VAT Act (today with more than 50 measures), which are intended to facilitate everyday taxation and create transparency and
legal certainty, including the extension of the balance tax rate method, which enables simplified accounting. • The second "module" under discussion is the flat rate of 6 percent, which is to replace the current rates (7.6 percent, of 2.4 percent for everyday goods and the special rate of 3.6 percent for accommodation services). Alternatively, a third "module" with two rates was presented - the standard rate of 7.6 percent, unchanged, and a reduced rate of 3.4 percent for basic necessities, as before, and now also for health care and other services now exempt. In particular, the health and social services sector, with around 23,000 companies, would be newly subject to VAT. One variant of this "module" provides for the continued exclusion of healthcare and parts of the social sector from taxation. The services of banks and insurance companies would continue to be excluded. At the end of June 2008, the Federal Council proposed a flat rate of 6.1 percent. On 17 December 2021 the Federal Council and the Council of States approved the indefinite proportional increase of the value-added tax by 0.4 percentage points in favour of the AHV as part of the reform of the
old-age and survivors' insurance (AHV) "Stabilization of the AHV (AHV 21)." The deadline for a referendum is 22 April 2022, after which a vote by the Swiss people must be held within one year, so that the increase in VAT rates can be implemented in 2023 at the earliest. The Federal Council and the Council of States approved the indefinite proportional increase of the value-added tax by 0.4 percentage points in favour of the AHV.
Regulation for 2011 until 2017 On 27 September 2009 the Swiss people approved a temporary increase in the value-added tax from 2011 to 2017 to provide additional funding for disability insurance. The standard rate is thus 8% during this period, the reduced rate 2.5% and the special rate for accommodation services 3.8%.
Initiative to abolish the value added tax In June 2011, the
Green Liberal Party launched a
popular initiative to abolish the value-added tax (
energy tax instead of value-added tax). According to the text of the initiative, this should be replaced by an energy tax on non-
renewable energy sources. The tax should be 'assessed per kilowatt-hour of primary energy', whereby different tax rates can be set for the individual energy sources according to their overall ecological balance. A number of other optional provisions in the initiative text leave room for the legislator to design the tax: There can be exceptions to full taxation, and
embodied energy can also be taxed additively to avoid distortions of competition. A rebate is planned for exports. With regard to the level of the energy tax, after a start at the level of the previous value-added tax, a fixed link to the
gross domestic product is planned so that the state quota does not fluctuate unpredictably; the tax is thus to be neutral in terms of the
state quota. Up to about 20 percent of the proceeds will be used to benefit old-age pensions and to subsidize health insurance premiums for lower-income earners. The intention of the initiators was to make the energy tax, which was justified by the nuclear phase-out after
Fukushima and the need for
climate policy action, fiscally neutral, i.e. not to additionally burden the citizens; the goal was a 'cost-neutral nuclear phase-out'. The Green Liberals wanted the tax to be 'neutral'. After the initiative was submitted on time in 2012, the Federal Council and the
Council of States basically supported its thrust in terms of climate and energy policy: However, very high energy taxes would be necessary to finance public budgets - estimated at over 20 billion Swiss francs, about 3 Swiss francs per liter of gasoline - and they would far exceed what can be justified in terms of energy and climate policy. In addition, the tax substrate would be smaller, unlike with the value-added tax, because the energy tax would have a steering effect; the tax would then have to increase. The complete abolition of the VAT would be wrong. The very high energy tax would also have negative distributional effects, since households with lower incomes would be disproportionately burdened. In the Council of States, the position of the initiative was represented by
Markus Stadler (GLP/UR), but after the rejection of a counter-proposal by a commission minority led by
Luc Recordon (Green/VD) with an
incentive tax and reimbursement of the proceeds to the population (29 to 12 votes), the Council of States in June (34 : 3) and the
National Council of Switzerland (171 : 27) in September 2014 also decided to recommend that the people reject the popular initiative. The
counter-proposal with energy steering taxes was rejected in the National Council by 110 votes to 79. The Federal Council wants to replace the current support system for the energy transition from 2021, admittedly, also by a "climate and energy steering system", a
consultation draft without abolition of VAT will be available in 2015.
Economists An abolition of the value-added tax has been proposed by the
Fribourg economists
Reiner Eichenberger and
Mark Schelker (published, among others, in
Weltwoche 7/04.). They list the following five main advantages: • The abolition of the value-added tax relieves the burden on all taxpayers, especially those on low incomes. • Especially for labor-intensive service companies, the value-added tax is practically a wage tax. Its abolition would greatly increase demand for simpler work. It would thus be an effective means of combating unemployment and the progressive impoverishment of low-skilled workers. • The administrative burden of VAT collection, which has been heavy for the federal administration and in certain sectors of the economy, would be eliminated. ==References==