If two processes attempt to enter a
critical section at the same time, the algorithm will allow only one process in, based on whose it is. If one process is already in the critical section, the other process will
busy wait for the first process to exit. This is done by the use of two flags, and , which indicate an intention to enter the critical section on the part of processes 0 and 1, respectively, and a variable that indicates who has priority between the two processes. Dekker's algorithm can be expressed in
pseudocode, as follows. Processes indicate an intention to enter the critical section which is tested by the outer while loop. If the other process has not flagged intent, the critical section can be entered safely irrespective of the current turn. Mutual exclusion will still be guaranteed as neither process can become critical before setting their flag (implying at least one process will enter the while loop). This also guarantees progress as waiting will not occur on a process which has withdrawn intent to become critical. Alternatively, if the other process's variable was set, the while loop is entered and the turn variable will establish who is permitted to become critical. Processes without priority will withdraw their intention to enter the critical section until they are given priority again (the inner while loop). Processes with priority will break from the while loop and enter their critical section. Dekker's algorithm guarantees
mutual exclusion, freedom from
deadlock, and freedom from
starvation. Let us see why the last property holds. Suppose p0 is stuck inside the loop forever. There is freedom from deadlock, so eventually p1 will proceed to its critical section and set (and the value of turn will remain unchanged as long as p0 doesn't progress). Eventually p0 will break out of the inner loop (if it was ever stuck on it). After that it will set to true and settle down to waiting for to become false (since , it will never do the actions in the while loop). The next time p1 tries to enter its critical section, it will be forced to execute the actions in its loop. In particular, it will eventually set to false and get stuck in the loop (since turn remains 0). The next time control passes to p0, it will exit the loop and enter its critical section. If the algorithm were modified by performing the actions in the loop without checking if , then there is a possibility of starvation. Thus all the steps in the algorithm are necessary. == Notes ==