Romantic primitivism In the 1st century CE, in the book
Germania, Tacitus ascribed to the Germans the cultural superiority of the
noble savage way of life, because Rome was too civilized, unlike the savage Germans. The art historian
Erwin Panofsky explains that: In the novel
The Adventures of Telemachus, Son of Ulysses (1699), in the “Encounter with the Mandurians” (Chapter IX), the theologian
François Fénelon presented the
noble savage stock character in conversation with civilized men from Europe about possession and ownership of
Nature: In the Kingdom of France, critics of the Crown and Church risked censorship and summary imprisonment without trial, and primitivism was political protest against the repressive imperial règimes of
Louis XIV and
Louis XV. In his travelogue of North America, the writer
Louis-Armand de Lom d'Arce de Lahontan, Baron de Lahontan, who had lived with the Huron Indians (
Wendat people), ascribed
deist and
egalitarian politics to Adario, a Canadian Indian who played the role of noble savage for French explorers:
Benjamin Franklin Benjamin Franklin was critical of government indifference to the
Paxton Boys massacre of the
Susquehannock in
Lancaster County, Pennsylvania in December 1763. Within weeks of the murders, he published
A Narrative of the Late Massacres in Lancaster County, in which he referred to the Paxton Boys as "Christian white savages" and called for judicial punishment of those who carried the Bible in one hand and a hatchet in the other. When the Paxton Boys led an armed march on
Philadelphia in February 1764, with the intent of killing the
Moravian Lenape and
Mohican who had been given shelter there, Franklin recruited
associators including
Quakers to defend the city and led a delegation that met with the Paxton leaders at
Germantown outside Philadelphia. The marchers dispersed after Franklin convinced them to submit their grievances in writing to the government. In his 1784 pamphlet
Remarks Concerning the Savages of North America, Franklin especially noted the racism inherent to the colonists using the word
savage as a synonym for indigenous people: Franklin praised the way of life of indigenous people, their customs of hospitality, their councils of government, and acknowledged that while some Europeans had foregone civilization to live like a "savage", the opposite rarely occurred, because few indigenous people chose "civilization" over "savagery".
Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1766) Like the Earl of Shaftesbury in the
Inquiry Concerning Virtue, or Merit (1699),
Jean-Jacques Rousseau likewise believed that Man is innately good, and that urban civilization, characterized by jealousy, envy, and self-consciousness, has made men bad in character. In
Discourse on the Origins of Inequality Among Men (1754), Rousseau said that in the primordial
state of nature, man was a solitary creature who was not
méchant (bad), but was possessed of an "innate repugnance to see others of his kind suffer." Moreover, as the
philosophe of the
Jacobin radicals of the French Revolution (1789–1799), ideologues accused Rousseau of claiming that the mythical
noble savage was a real type of man, despite the term not appearing in work written by Rousseau; in addressing
The Supposed Primitivism of Rousseau’s Discourse on Inequality (1923), the academic Arthur O. Lovejoy said that: In the
Discourse on the Origins of Inequality, Rousseau said that the rise of humanity began a "formidable struggle for existence" between the species man and the other animal species of Nature. That under the pressure of survival emerged ''le caractère spécifique de l'espèce humaine
, the specific quality of character, which distinguishes man from beast, such as intelligence capable of "almost unlimited development", and the faculté de se perfectionner'', the capability of perfecting himself. Having invented tools, discovered fire, and transcended the state of nature, Rousseau said that "it is easy to see. . . . that all our labors are directed upon two objects only, namely, for oneself, the commodities of life, and consideration on the part of others"; thus
amour propre (self-regard) is a "factitious feeling arising, only in society, which leads a man to think more highly of himself than of any other." Therefore, "it is this desire for reputation, honors, and preferment which devours us all . . . this rage to be distinguished, that we own what is best and worst in men — our virtues and our vices, our sciences and our errors, our conquerors and our philosophers — in short, a vast number of evil things and a small number of good [things]"; that is the aspect of character "which inspires men to all the evils which they inflict upon one another." Men become men only in a civil society based upon law, and only a reformed system of education can make men good; the academic Lovejoy explains that: Rousseau proposes reorganizing society with a
social contract that will "draw from the very evil from which we suffer the remedy which shall cure it"; Lovejoy notes that in the
Discourse on the Origins of Inequality, Rousseau:
Charles Dickens In 1853, in the weekly magazine
Household Words, Charles Dickens published a negative review of the Indian Gallery cultural program, by the portraitist
George Catlin, which then was touring England. About Catlin's oil paintings of the North American natives, the poet and critic
Charles Baudelaire said that "He [Catlin] has brought back alive the proud and free characters of these chiefs; both their
nobility and manliness." , 1849) , Chief of the Ojibwa Indians of the Great Plains. (George Catlin, 1832) Despite European idealization of the mythical noble savage as a type of morally superior man, in the essay “The Noble Savage” (1853), Dickens expressed repugnance for the American Indians and their way of life, because they were dirty and cruel and continually quarrelled among themselves. In the satire of
romanticised primitivism Dickens showed that the painter Catlin, the Indian Gallery of portraits and landscapes, and the white people who admire the idealized American Indians or the
bushmen of Africa are examples of the term
noble savage used as a means of
Othering a person into a
racialist stereotype. Dickens begins by dismissing the mythical noble savage as not being a distinct human being: Dickens ends his cultural criticism by reiterating his argument against the romanticized
persona of the mythical noble savage:
Theories of racialism In 1860, the physician
John Crawfurd and the anthropologist
James Hunt identified the racial stereotype of
the noble savage as an example of
scientific racism, yet, as advocates of
polygenism — that each
race is a distinct species of Man — Crawfurd and Hunt dismissed the arguments of their opponents by accusing them of being proponents of "Rousseau's Noble Savage". Later in his career, Crawfurd re-introduced the
noble savage term to modern
anthropology and deliberately ascribed coinage of the term to Jean-Jacques Rousseau. ==Modern perspectives==