In contrast to the mainstream interpretation, a
fringe theory proposes that the reliefs depict
Ancient Egyptian technology, based on comparison to similar modern devices (such as a
Cathode-ray tube,
Geissler tubes,
Crookes tubes, and
arc lamps).
Norman Lockyer's passing reference to a colleague's humorous suggestion that electric lamps would explain the absence of
lampblack deposits in the tombs has sometimes been forwarded as an argument supporting this interpretation (another explanation is the use of a system of mirrors). Proponents of this interpretation have also used a text stating that "high poles covered with copper plates were erected to break the storms coming from on high" to argue this, but Bolko Stern has written in detail explaining why the copper-covered tops of poles (which were lower than the associated pylons) do not relate to electricity or lightning, pointing out that no evidence of anything used to manipulate electricity had been found in Egypt and that this was a magical and not a technical installation. Archaeologist and
debunker Kenneth Feder argued that if ancient Egyptians really had such advanced technology, some light bulb remains (glass shards, metal sockets, filaments...) should have been discovered during archaeological excavations. By applying
Occam's razor, he instead highlighted the feasibility of the aforementioned mirrors system, and that the ancient Egyptians knew that adding salt to torches minimized lampblack. == See also ==