Rivera was a controversial choice for this art project, as he was known to follow
Marxist philosophy. The Depression had disrupted American faith in industrial and economic progress. Some critics viewed the murals as Marxist propaganda. When the murals were completed, the Detroit Institute for the Arts invited various clergymen to comment. Catholic and Episcopalian clergy condemned the murals as blasphemous.
The Detroit News protested that they were "vulgar" and "un-American". As a result of the controversy, 10,000 people visited the museum on a single Sunday, and the city increased its budget. One panel on the North wall features a
Christ-like child figure with golden hair reminiscent of a halo. Flanking it on the right is a horse (rather than the donkey of Christian tradition); on the left is an ox. Directly below are several sheep, an animal included in traditional Nativity scenes. It also represents Christ as
Agnus Dei (Lamb of God). A doctor fills the role of
Joseph and a nurse that of
Mary; together they are administering a
vaccination to the child. In the background three scientists, like
biblical Magi, are engaged in what appears to be a research experiment. This part of the fresco is clearly a modern take on traditional images of the
Holy Family, but some critics interpret it as
parody rather than
homage. At its unveiling, this panel so offended some members of Detroit's religious community that they demanded it be destroyed, but commissioner
Edsel Ford and DIA Director
Wilhelm Valentiner held firm. It remains in place today. During the 1950s, the DIA erected a sign above the entrance to the Rivera Court that read: ==See also==