Stylistically, the
Devotions is an example of 17th-century
devotional writing, and has been compared by Roger Rollin, professor of literature at
Clemson University, to the
Holy Sonnets and considered, in effect, a sequel. In the context of 17th-century devotional writing, Rollin uses the
Devotions to demonstrate that, in his view, such writings were "more public than private, [serving as] vehicles for the diagnosis of spiritual malaise and as sources of remedies". Lander argued that the full title signifies "growth of the spirit through physical ordeal", and in doing so draws on the devotional works of
Joseph Hall. Thomas F. Van Laan, writing in
Studies in Philology, draws parallels between Donne's style and the
Ignatian exercises: a set of structured mental exercises designed to bring an individual closer to understanding God. A number of literary theorists have approached the
Devotions as politically themed.
Richard Strier, in particular, identifies the
Devotions as an "
Arminian polemic", arguing that it was highly atypical of Donne to actually publish works, rather than merely let them circulate amongst friends. Both before and after ordination, Donne actively resisted publication, normally only publishing works that had been the result of a commission, such as
The Anniversaries or
Pseudo-Martyr. The
Devotions, however, were "literally rushed" into print, with the volume being handed to the printers a month after he had recovered from his disease. Strier argues that Donne's rationale for publishing the
Devotions matches his rationale for publishing a sermon, the
Encaenia, the same year, to assert the importance of "places, and of dayes, and of all outward meanes", because he felt some sense of urgency about what he had to say. This is coupled with
Devotion XVI, in which Donne explicitly comes out against
Puritanism and is simultaneously "purposely militant", deliberately frustrating the other extreme from Puritanism, where "the Arminianism and the polemical anti-puritanism of the volume becomes explicit". Dave Gray and Jeanne Shami, writing in the
Modern Language Quarterly, argue that it was not just a work of political rhetoric but a work of political advice, aimed at
Prince Charles, to whom it was dedicated. The political situation at the time was complex, as
King James was ill and Charles attempting to gain control of the government. Gray and Shami highlight the noted line "No man is an island"; while most interpret it spiritually, they argue that it was a reminder to the prince and his advisors that "even private actions have public consequences". The veiled nature of the political references was deliberate; it allowed the work to be acceptable to the censors, but accessible to Charles and those close to him. In the event that they rejected the underlying message, it would also be accessible to other prominent and influential political figures. Lander argues that the structure of the work is itself symbolic. As well as the division of the poem into 23 parts, each signifying and describing one day of Donne's illness, each part is itself split in three – representing the
Trinity. The use of three elements – Meditation, Expostulation, and Prayer – also matches the three services found in the
Book of Common Prayer, a common influence on devotional writers of Donne's era.Donne in the poem emphasise the idea of human world as a whole in which each human being is related to others. so Donne says that every man is a continent connected to the main, if the continent dies, it will certainly affect the main land, in the same way if a man dies his death is felt by the people related to the man. That shows that when the death bell tolls, it not only tolls for the man but for the mankind who are related to him. ==Critical response==