A well-known empirical approximation used to calculate the dew point, dry, given just the actual ("dry bulb") air temperature, (in degrees Celsius) and
relative humidity (in percent), , is the Magnus formula: \begin{align} \gamma(T,\mathrm{RH}) & = \ln\left( \frac{\mathrm{RH}}{\ 100\ } \right) + \frac{b\ T}{\ c\ +\ T\ }\ ;\\[8pt] T_\mathsf{dry} & = \frac{\ c\ \gamma(T,\mathrm{RH})\ }{\ b\ -\ \gamma(T,\mathrm{RH})\ }\ ; \end{align} where = 17.625 and = 243.04 °C. The values of and were selected by minimizing the maximum deviation over the range −40 °C to +50 °C. The more complete formulation and origin of this approximation involves the interrelated
saturated water
vapor pressure (in units of
millibars, also called
hectopascals) at , s( ), and the actual vapor pressure (also in units of millibars), a( ), which can be either found with or approximated with the barometric pressure (in millibars), mbar, and "
wet-bulb" temperature, wet is (unless declared otherwise, all temperatures are expressed in
degrees Celsius): \begin{align} P_\mathrm{s}(T)& = \frac{\ 100\ }{\ \mathrm{RH}\ }\ P_\mathrm{a}(T) = a\ e^{\frac{b\ T}{\ c\ +\ T\ }}\ ; \\[8pt] P_\mathrm{a}(T) & = \frac\mathrm{RH}{100}\ P_\mathrm{s}(T) = a\ e^{\gamma(T,\mathrm{RH})} \\[8pt] &\approx P_\mathrm{s}(T_\mathrm{w}) - \mathrm{BP}_\mathsf{mbar}\ 0.00066\ \left( 1 + 0.00115\ T_\mathsf{wet} \right) \left( T - T_\mathsf{wet} \right)\ ;\\[8pt] T_\mathsf{dry} & = \frac{\ c\ \ln\frac{\ P_\mathrm{a}(T)\ }{ a }\ }{\ b - \ln\frac{\ P_\mathrm{a}(T)\ }{ a } }\ ; \end{align} For greater accuracy, s() and therefore ( , ) can be enhanced, using part of the
Bögel modification, also known as the
Arden Buck equation, which adds a fourth constant : \begin{align} P_\mathrm{s,m}(T) & = a\ e^{\left( b\ -\ \frac{\ T\ }{ d } \right) \left(\frac{ T }{\ c\ +\ T\ }\right)}\ ;\\[8pt] \gamma_\mathrm{m}(T,\mathrm{RH}) &= \ln\left(\frac{\ \mathrm{RH}\ }{\ 100\ }\ e^{\left( b\ -\ \frac{\ T\ }{ d } \right) \left(\frac{ T }{\ c\ +\ T\ }\right)} \right)\ ; \\[8pt] T_\mathsf{dry} & = \frac{\ c\ \ln\frac{\ P_\mathrm{a}(T)\ }{ a }\ }{\ b - \ln\frac{\ P_\mathrm{a}(T)\ }{ a }\ } = \frac{\ c\ \ln\left( \frac{\ \mathrm{RH}\ }{\ 100\ }\frac{\ P_\mathrm{s,m}(T)\ }{ a }\right)\ }{\ b\ -\ \ln\left(\frac{\ \mathrm{RH}\ }{\ 100\ } \frac{\ P_\mathrm{s,m}(T)\ }{ a }\right)\ } = \frac{\ c\ \gamma_m(T,\mathrm{RH})\ }{\ b\ -\ \gamma_m(T,\mathrm{RH})\ }; \end{align} where • = 6.1121 mbar , = 18.678 , = 257.14 °C , = 234.5 °C. There are several different constant sets in use. The ones used in
NOAA's presentation are taken from a 1980 paper by David Bolton in the
Monthly Weather Review: • = 6.112 mbar, = 17.67, = 243.5 °C. These valuations provide a maximum error of 0.1%, for and Also noteworthy is the Sonntag1990, • = 6.112 mbar , = 17.62 , = 243.12 °C ; for (error ±0.35 °C). Another common set of values originates from the 1974
Psychrometry and Psychrometric Charts. • = 6.105 mbar , = 17.27 , = 237.7 °C ; for (error ±0.4 °C). Also, in the
Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, Arden Buck provides several different valuation sets, with different maximum errors for different temperature ranges. Two particular sets provide a range of −40 °C to +50 °C between the two, with even lower maximum error within the indicated range than all the sets above: • = 6.1121 mbar , = 17.368 , = 238.88 °C ; for (error ≤ 0.05%). • = 6.1121 mbar , = 17.966 , = 247.15 °C ; for (error ≤ 0.06%).
Simple approximation There is also a simple approximation that allows conversion between the dew point, temperature, and relative humidity. This approach is accurate to within about ±1 °C as long as the relative humidity is above 50%: \begin{align} T_\mathrm{dry} &\approx T - \frac{\ 100-\mathrm{RH}\ }{ 5 }\ ; \\[5pt] \mathrm{RH} &\approx 100 - 5\ ( T - T_\mathrm{dry} )\ ; \end{align} This can be expressed as a simple rule of thumb: For every 1 °C difference in the dew point and dry bulb temperatures, the relative humidity decreases by 5%, starting with RH = 100% when the dew point equals the dry bulb temperature. The derivation of this approach, a discussion of its accuracy, comparisons to other approximations, and more information on the history and applications of the dew point, can be found in an article published in the
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. For temperatures in degrees Fahrenheit, these approximations convert to \begin{align} T_\mathrm{dry,^\circ F} &\approx T_\mathrm{{}^\circ F} - \tfrac{\ 9\ }{25}\ \left(100 - \mathrm{RH} \right)\ ;\\[5pt] \mathrm{RH} &\approx 100 - \tfrac{25}{\ 9\ }\ \left(T_\mathrm{{}^\circ F} - T_\mathrm{dry,^\circ F} \right)\ ; \end{align} For example, a relative humidity of 100% means dew point is the same as air temp. For 90% , dew point is 3 °F lower than air temperature. For every 10 percent lower, dew point drops 3 °F. == Frost point ==