History Dickinsonia was first discovered in 1946 at the Ediacara Member of the
Rawnsley Quartzite,
Flinders Ranges in
South Australia.
Reg Sprigg described
Dickinsonia the following year and named it after
Ben Dickinson, then Director of Mines for
South Australia, and head of the government department that employed Sprigg. Additional specimens of
Dickinsonia have also been found in the
Mogilev Formation in the
Dniester River Basin of
Ukraine, the
White Sea in
Russia, and the Dengying Formation in the Yangtze Gorges area, South China. (ca. 551–543 Ma). Sprigg's initial interpretation was that
Dickinsonia was a
jellyfish-like organism from the early
Cambrian. He suspected that the imprint left behind was a cast of the flattened bell, and that the grooves radiating from the center were possibly some sort of canal system or rigid structure. In 1955, Harrington and Moore published their own classification of
Dickinsonia, assigning it to class Dipleurozoa, order Dickinsoniida, and family Dickinsoniidae in the now defunct group
Coelenterata. the existence of
Proterozoic life became more widely accepted among paleontologists. This discovery lead
Dickinsonia and other South Australian organisms to be properly recognized as Precambrian in age. The segmentation of the recently discovered
Spriggina from the same locality lead it and the similarly segmented
Dickinsonia to be classified as
annelids, which remained the leading hypothesis for the next few decades, albeit with reservations. In 1985, following studies that concluded that
Dickinsonia and related taxa had glide symmetry rather than bilteral symmetry, a new phylum,
Proarticulata, was erected to include the Ediacaran organisms that were assumed to have glide reflection, which included
Spriggina,
Vendia, and several others. Their relationships to other organisms remain uncertain and numerous hypotheses have been offered since.
Adolf Seilacher proposed that most Ediacaran organisms were closely related to each other, as part of the grouping "
Vendobionta", though recent authors argue that this grouping is likely
polyphyletic. Some authors do not use Proarticulata and instead use the clade Dickinsoniomorpha. This has been broadly rejected by most authors, who argue that a marine environment better fits available evidence. Other proposals have included giant
protists,
placozoans, or
cnidarians.
Modern classification While
Dickinsonia's relationships to other organisms are still highly contentious, most biologists consider an animal with
stem-
bilaterian affinity to be the most likely interpretation. In 2018 it was found that many Russian specimens contained
cholesterol, which is only produced by animals, supporting an animal affinity. The predictable growth patterns, clear left and right sides, and a posterior-anterior axis all suggest that
Dickinsonia was a bilaterian. However, most modern bilaterians have a mouth and anus connected by a gut, none of which has been found in
Dickinsonia. This almost certainly rules out
Dickinsonia to be a
crown-bilaterian, but could mean it was a stem-bilaterian. ==References==