The nature of complaints handled by the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions are as follows: • Malicious/ selective prosecution. • Inaction/delay/Refusal/Neglect/ to carry out prosecution of a criminal case after completion of the requisite investigations. • Police ignore/ neglects/delays to execute DPP's directions to investigate and or other directions that are given in any given criminal matter. • Requests by an aggrieved complainant to ODPP for an Appeal in case of perceived unjustified Acquittal. • Request by a complainant to withdraw a criminal case. • Request by a complainant (and/or their close relatives) and or prosecution witnesses for Witness Protection at the prosecution stage. • Concern as a result of a decision to waive a prosecution or to abandon a prosecution that had been commenced against a person charged. • Miscellaneous Criminal applications. • Interference with witness statements at the prosecution stage. • Seeking Consent to conduct private investigations. • Petition to prosecute. • Dissatisfaction with a judgement or outcome of a criminal trial due to acts and omissions of ODPP. • A missing/lost prosecution file. • A citizen dissatisfied with ODPP's response to a criminal case • A request for ODPP to review its decision on whether to charge or not to charge. • Charging of an accused with a less serious charge than the actual or charging with a more serious offence than the actual. • Unresponsiveness, lack of communication on matters of prosecution and or other incidental matters. • Refusal to release exhibits to a victim of crime thereby perpetuating the suffering of the victim. • Refusal by ODPP to charge a suspect. • Mishandling of a prosecution case; the prosecutor interfering with the witness by attempting to coerce the witness to give evidence in a biased manner. • Withdrawal of a criminal case without justification. • Prosecution case taking too long to conclude because of an indolent prosecutor. • Sabotage of the success of a criminal case by the failure by ODPP to call key witnesses. • Lethargy or lack of goodwill to prosecute. • Complaint against ODPP's county offices. • Professional misconduct and unresponsiveness by prosecutors, e.g. rudeness, arrogance and absence from office • A person masquerading as a prosecutor. • Corrupt Prosecutors. • Abuse of prosecutorial powers. • Abuse of the criminal process by converting a purely civil matter to become a criminal matter (e.g. if police investigations get entangled in a purely civil matter that then results in a prosecution, such a prosecution is an abuse of the criminal law process. N/B: Please note that it is also possible to have both civil and criminal aspects emanating from the same transaction and investigators have every right to recommend charging if they come across evidence of criminal activity in a civil transaction). The first holder of the Office of Director of Public Prosecutions under the 2010 Constitution was
Keriako Tobiko who served from 2011 before resigning in 2018 when he was appointed as the
cabinet Secretary for the ministry of environment and natural resources. == Other jurisdictions ==