Prior to the District Court's commencement, Western Australia's court system had two tiers: the lower tier consisting of the Court of Petty Sessions and the Local Court; and the upper tier consisting solely of the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court held jurisdiction over all indictable criminal offences and civil matters, whilst the Court of Petty Sessions held jurisdiction over summary criminal offences, committal jurisdiction for indictable offences, whilst the Local Court had jurisdiction to hear civil claims not exceeding $1,000, and not on categories of claims including ejectment, title to land, wills, libel, slander, seduction or breach of promise of marriage. The most distinct separation in decision making was between the jurisdiction of
judges, who were officers of the Supreme Court, and stipendiary
magistrates and
Justices of the Peace of the lower Courts. During this period and towards the beginning of the 1960s, public interest in establishing an intermediary Court began, with the District Court commencing on 1 April 1970 following a proclamation by the
Governor Douglas Kendrew on 26 March. According to Griffith (1969), the District Court was introduced to "enable adequate administration of justice in our expanding community." Griffith (1969) identified four key advantages to establishing a District Court, being (a) decentralising the legal profession to serve areas outside of Perth, (b) enabling Western Australia to legislate for uncontentious divorce petitions to be heard in the District Court, (c) preventing backlog in the Supreme Court, and (d) to establish a flexible judicial system for future administration of justice. ==Legal developments since commencement==