MarketDocodonta
Company Profile

Docodonta

Docodonta is an order of extinct Mesozoic mammaliaforms. They were among the most common mammaliaforms of their time, persisting from the Early Jurassic to the Early Cretaceous across the continent of Laurasia. They are distinguished from other early mammaliaforms by their relatively complex molar teeth.

Description
Skeletal traits Jaw and ear Docodontans have a long and low mandible (lower jaw), formed primarily by the tooth-bearing dentary bone. The dentary connects to the cranium via a joint with the squamosal, a connection which is strengthened relative to earlier mammaliaforms. The other bones in the jaw, known as postdentary elements, are still connected to the dentary and lie within a groove (the postdentary trough) in the rear part of the dentary's inner edge. Nevertheless, they are very slender, hosting hooked prongs which start to converge towards an oval-shaped area immediately behind the dentary. The ectotympanic bone, also known as the angular, fits into a deep slot on the dentary which opens backwards, a characteristic unique to docodontans. The malleus (also known as the articular) sends down a particularly well-developed prong known as the manubrium, which is sensitive to vibrations. The incus (also known as the quadrate) is still relatively large and rests against the petrosal bone of the braincase, a remnant of a pre-mammalian style jaw joint. In true mammals, the postdentary elements detach fully and shrink further, becoming the ossicles of the middle ear and embracing a circular eardrum. Postcranial skeleton The oldest unambiguous fossil evidence of hair is found in a well-preserved specimen of the docodontan Castorocauda, though hair likely evolved much earlier in synapsids. Vertebrae at the base of the tail often have expanded transverse processes (rib pedestals), supporting powerful tail musculature. Teeth Like other mammaliaforms, docodontan teeth include peg-like incisors, fang-like canines, and numerous interlocking premolars and molars. Most mammaliaforms have fairly simple molars primarily suited for shearing and slicing food. Docodontans, on the other hand, have developed specialized molars with crushing surfaces. The shape of each molar is defined by a characteristic pattern of conical cusps, with sharp, concave crests connecting the center of each cusp to adjacent cusps. Docodontan and shuotheriid teeth are so similar that some genera, namely Itatodon and Paritatodon, have been considered members of either group. A 2024 study, describing the new shuotheriid Feredocodon, even proposed that shuotheriids and docodontans were most closely related to each other among mammaliaforms. The study named a new clade, Docodontiformes, to encompass the two groups. == Paleoecology and paleobiology ==
Paleoecology and paleobiology
Docodontans and other Mesozoic mammals were traditionally thought to have been primarily ground dwelling and insectivorous, but recent more complete fossils from China have shown this is not the case. Castorocauda from the Middle Jurassic of China, and possibly Haldanodon from the Upper Jurassic of Portugal, were specialised for a semi-aquatic lifestyle. Castorocauda had a flattened tail, similar to that of a beaver, and recurved molar cusps, which suggests a possible diet of fish or aquatic invertebrates. although this could also be explained by the ease with which these environments preserve fossils compared with more terrestrial ones. Recent discoveries of other complete docodontans such as the specialised digging species Docofossor, ==Classification==
Classification
The lineage of Docodonta evolved prior to the origin of living mammals: monotremes, marsupials, and placentals. In other words, docodontans are outside of the mammalian crown group, which only includes animals descended from the last common ancestor of living mammals. Previously, docodontans were sometimes regarded as belonging to Mammalia, owing to the complexity of their molars and the fact that they possess a dentary-squamosal jaw joint. However, modern authors usually limit the term "Mammalia" to the crown group, excluding earlier mammaliaforms like the docodontans. Nevertheless, docodontans are still closely related to crown-Mammalia, to a greater extent than many other early mammaliaform groups such as Morganucodonta and Sinoconodon. Some authors also consider docodontans to lie crownward of the order Haramiyida, Cladogram based on a phylogenetic analysis of Zhou et al. (2019) focusing on a wide range of mammaliamorphs: A 1956 paper by Bryan Patterson instead argued that docodontan teeth were impossible to homologize with modern mammals. He drew comparisons to the teeth of Morganucodon and other "triconodont" mammaliaforms, which had fairly simple lower molars with a straight row of large cusps. However, re-evaluations of mammaliaform tooth homology in the late 1990s established that docodontans were not closely related to either morganucodonts or therians. Instead, they were found to be similar to certain early "symmetrodonts", a broad and polyphyletic grouping of mammaliaforms with triangular upper molars. These "symmetrodonts" have three major cusps (c, a, and b) set in a triangular arrangement on their lower molars. These cusps would be homologous to cusps c, a, and g in docodontans, which have a similar size and position. The lingual cusp (cusp X) is prominent in Woutersia. Unambiguous docodontans are restricted to the Northern Hemisphere. The oldest docodontan is Nujalikodon, from the earliest Jurassic (Hettangian stage) of Greenland. Many more species appear in the fossil record in the Middle Jurassic. Very few docodontans survived into the Cretaceous Period; the youngest known members of the group are Sibirotherium and Khorotherium, from the Early Cretaceous of Siberia. One disputed docodont, Gondtherium, has been described from India, which was previously part of the Southern Hemisphere continent of Gondwana. Reigitherium, from the Late Cretaceous of Argentina, has previously been described as a docodont, though it is now considered a meridiolestidan mammal. Some authors have suggested splitting Docodonta into two families (Simpsonodontidae and Tegotheriidae), but the monophyly of these groups (in their widest form) are not found in any other analyses, and therefore not accepted by all mammal palaeontologists. Cladograms based on phylogenetic analyses focusing on docodontan relationships: Topology of Zhou et al. (2019), based on tooth, cranial, and postcranial traits: • B. serendipitus Waldman & Savage 1972 • Castorocauda lutrasimilis Ji et al. 2006 • D. victor (Marsh 1880) [Dicrocynodon victor (Marsh 1880); Diplocynodon victor Marsh 1880] • D. striatus Marsh 1881 [disputed] • D. affinis (Marsh 1887) [Enneodon affinis Marsh 1887] [disputed] • D. crassus (Marsh 1887) [Enneodon crassus Marsh 1887; Ennacodon crassus (Marsh 1887)] [disputed] • D. superus Simpson 1929 [disputed] • Docofossor brachydactylus Luo et al. 2015 • Gondtherium dattai Prasad & Manhas 2007 • Krusatodon kirtlingtonensis Sigogneau-Russell 2003 • Microdocodon gracilis Zhou et al. 2019 • P. major Sigogneau-Russell 2003 [disputed] • Sibirotherium rossicus Maschenko, Lopatin & Voronkevich 2002 • Simpsonodon Kermack et al. 1987 • S. splendens (Kühne 1969) • S. sibiricus Averianov et al. 2010 • Tashkumyrodon desideratus Martin & Averianov 2004 • Tegotherium gubini Tatarinov 1994 ==See also==
tickerdossier.comtickerdossier.substack.com