Document.no has been described by academics as a website that features
anti-Muslim According to Sindre Bangstad, an expert on the far-right, the website is permeated by the
Eurabia conspiracy theory. The site has been described by
Aftenposten as "an Islam-critical and Israel-friendly, so-called blue-blog", and by
Dagbladet as "Islam-critical and socially conservative." and among the political right's "most important arenas for debate" around immigration and Islam. In a 2021 re-evaluation, the NCAR identified Document.no as a publisher of far-right anti-Islam rhetoric, stating that "far-right extremists often claim– as Rustad does, that Muslims today try to conquer Europe as their ancestors" and that "This rhetoric, and especially the three campaigns deemed to have halted the rise of Islam in Europe, plays a central role in the far-right discourse, especially as ideological motivation. The same mindset and rhetoric characterize the site Document.no." Helge Øgrim, editor of
Journalisten, the journal of the
Norwegian Union of Journalists, in July 2011 described Document.no as an "anti-immigrant forum which has evolved into a hotbed of galloping Islamophobia".
Lars Gule described it in
The Vancouver Sun as "a far-right web forum" that is "dominated by Islamophobic and anti-immigration commentary", while the conservative Muslim commentator
Mohammad Usman Rana has called it "a right-wing populist and Muslimphobic interest group". Writer on right-wing extremism
Øyvind Strømmen however rejects that the website is far-right, instead describing the authors as "socially conservative immigration-opponents". The Swedish
Expo has described it as "right-wing radical and Islamophobic". According to
Klassekampen in 2014, "Document has been accused of releasing racist and xenophobic voices but is also praised for being a serious and fact-based site for Islamic criticism." Author and former
Aschehoug editor
Halvor Fosli has expressed support for many of the website's positions, and has been involved in some limited publishing cooperation.
Anders Giæver, a commentator writing for the
Verdens Gang tabloid, criticized the investigation that led to Tolg's resignation from her job in 2015 as a "Kafkaesque process" that followed "targeting" from online forums, Facebook groups, and
RationalWiki. Following his admission to the Association of Norwegian Editors, Rustad has been criticised for increasingly promoting conspiracy theories, related to the
2020 United States presidential election,
COVID-19 and the "
deep state". ==See also==