A 2009 study on the evolution of
protein structure proposed a new mechanism for Dollo's law. It examined a
hormone receptor that had evolved from an ancestral
protein that was able to bind two
hormones to a new protein that was specific for a single hormone. This change was produced by two
amino acid substitutions, which prevent binding of the second hormone. However, several other changes subsequently occurred, which were selectively neutral as they did not affect hormone binding. When the authors tried to revert the protein back to its ancestral state by mutating the two "binding residues", they found the other changes had destabilised the ancestral state of the protein. They concluded that in order for this protein to evolve in reverse and regain its ability to bind two hormones, several independent neutral
mutations would have to occur purely by chance with no selection pressure. As this is extremely unlikely, it may explain why evolution tends to run in one direction. ==Proposed exceptions==