Kolmogorov (1933) showed that when
F is
continuous, the supremum \scriptstyle\sup_t G_n(t) and supremum of absolute value, \scriptstyle\sup_t |G_n(t)|
converges in distribution to the laws of the same functionals of the
Brownian bridge B(
t), see the
Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. In 1949 Doob asked whether the convergence in distribution held for more general functionals, thus formulating a problem of
weak convergence of random functions in a suitable
function space. a general extension for the Doob–Kolmogorov heuristic approach. In the original paper, Donsker proved that the convergence in law of
Gn to the Brownian bridge holds for
Uniform[0,1] distributions with respect to
uniform convergence in
t over the interval [0,1].{{cite journal |first=M. D. |last=Donsker |author-link=Monroe D. Donsker |title=Justification and extension of Doob's heuristic approach to the Kolmogorov–Smirnov theorems |journal=
Annals of Mathematical Statistics |volume=23 |issue= 2|pages=277–281 |year=1952 |doi=10.1214/aoms/1177729445 |mr=47288 | zbl = 0046.35103 However Donsker's formulation was not quite correct because of the problem of measurability of the functionals of discontinuous processes. In 1956 Skorokhod and Kolmogorov defined a separable metric
d, called the
Skorokhod metric, on the space of
càdlàg functions on [0,1], such that convergence for
d to a continuous function is equivalent to convergence for the sup norm, and showed that
Gn converges in law in \mathcal{D}[0,1] to the Brownian bridge. Later Dudley reformulated Donsker's result to avoid the problem of measurability and the need of the Skorokhod metric. One can prove that there exist
Xi, iid uniform in [0,1] and a sequence of sample-continuous Brownian bridges
Bn, such that :\|G_n-B_n\|_\infty is measurable and
converges in probability to 0. An improved version of this result, providing more detail on the
rate of convergence, is the
Komlós–Major–Tusnády approximation. ==See also==