Initially, music critics were divided in their opinion of the
Double Concerto. It was called "highly intellectualized", and even "absolutely threadbare", but the
Daily Telegraph wrote that it was "completely satisfactory, for even at a first hearing the close relation between form and material is obvious", and noted that the second movement's melody had "moments of rare beauty" in spite of being "just a little heartless". Holsts's friends were encouraging.
Ralph Vaughan Williams told him that "The Lament & Ground are splendid – I'm not
quite so sure about the scherzo – and even that boils down to not being quite so sure about the tune".
R. O. Morris wrote that "You made your 2 keys sound like one key, and how otherwise should it be? Any fool can write in Xn keys and make it sound like Xn keys. But the subtlety and detachment of the concerto puzzled audiences, who would have preferred Holst to carry on writing works along the lines of
The Planets. It has over the years been an infrequently performed work, perhaps because it gives soloists no chance to display their virtuosity, or because a concerto only about 14 minutes long is hard to programme. In recent years one critic has written that he found the
Double Concerto "not a wholly satisfactory work: there is too much slow music, and the outer movements lose momentum through frequent changes of speed". Others, on the other hand, have described it as "striking...a fine example of Holst's later, sparer style", "a wonderful work, rhythmic and colourfully orchestrated", and as a fine example of "the art that conceals art. It is remarkable that the composer of
The Planets was a composer of such subtlety." Paul Shoemaker called it "one of my very favorite of all Holst's works; it is amazing that it is not more frequently played." == Editions ==