Dirty Duck premiered in Los Angeles on July 8, 1974. The distributor did not promote it heavily, and most reviewers disliked it. Because the film was X-rated,
The New York Times refused to run the film's advertisement. This was a somewhat awkward situation, as the ad included a positive review from The New York Times. According to Swenson, "it didn't have a big following, ... but it is still in video stores." The film played for about two weeks in
New York City.
Jerry Beck wrote a review in which he called the film "raunchier than
Ralph Bakshi's films." He went on to say that the humor of the film "is good, but the design and drawing is downright awful. It seems to be sort of a cross between
Jules Feiffer and
Gahan Wilson, if that can be imagined." Beck also stated that the film was "very similar to
R. Crumb's
Mr. Natural and Flakey Foont. There is no reason that the duck should be a duck. Every character in the film is human, and he just seems to be a duck just to give the film a catchy title. There are some highly imaginative animated ideas here, but the film's entertainment value is at a minimum." Beck later called the film "one of the most overlooked animated features of the 1970s, a glorious experimental mess of a film, which, from today's vantage point, looks incredibly creative and daring, and something current Hollywood studios would never attempt."
Playboy noted that the advertisements for the film said, "this film has no socially redeeming value" and continued "well, that's dead right, yet this movie has some value as a promising X-rated cartoon in the tradition of Ralph Bakshi's
Fritz the Cat.
The New York Times called it a "zany, lively, uninhibited, sexual odyssey that manages to mix a bit of
Walter Mitty and a touch of
Woody Allen with some of the innocence of
Walt Disney [and the] urban smarts of Ralph Bakshi". Charles Solomon of the
Los Angeles Times gave the film an extremely negative review, calling "a sprawling undisciplined piece of sniggering vulgarity that resembles nothing so much as animated bathroom graffiti. [The film is] degrading to women, blacks,
Chicanos, gays, cops, lesbians, and anyone with an IQ of more than 45".
Variety commented that the film "has little to recommend." ==See also==