Van Hoepen identified
Dromicosaurus as a member of the
Anchisauridae, clearly different from the related
Plateosauridae that was also recognised at that time. At the time, both groups were thought to represent
theropod dinosaurs, while they are classified as
basal sauropodomorphs today. Von Hoepen found his new
taxon to be distinct from other taxa including
Massospondylus carinatus,
Massospondylus harriesi,
Aetonyx palustris,
Thecodontosaurus skirtopodus,
Thecodontosaurus browni,
Gryponyx africanus,
Teratosaurus suevicus, and
Plateosaurus quenstedti. Much of the sauropodomorph material from the Lower Jurassic of southern Africa, including
Dromicosaurus, would later be lumped under the species
Massospondylus carinatus, which, at that time, was only known from fragments. Van Hoepen pointed out differences in the femur and tibia to the latter species: The
fourth trochanter (ridge on the femur where muscles attached) was located more proximally (higher on the bone) in
Dromicosaurus, and the proportions of the lower end of the tibia were different. Von Huene, in 1932, stated that
Dromicosaurus was closely related to
M. carinatus,
M. harriesi, and
Thecodontosaurus. He argued that the high location of the fourth trochanter and the short fore limb (with the humerus measuring only half the length of the femur) suggested that the limbs were strongly bent at the knee, and that the animal must have been
bipedal. In 1976,
Peter Galton and Michael Albert Cluver considered
Dromicosaurus gracilis as a synonym of
Massospondylus harriesi, following an opinion of John Attridge. Michael Cooper, in a 1981 monograph on
Massospondylus, instead synonymised
Dromicosaurus gracilis with
M. carinatus. The two most recent revisions, those of Galton (1990) and Galton and Upchurch (2004), instead list
Dromicosaurus gracilis as an indeterminate (
dubious) sauropodomorph. == References ==